Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring Fails Completely, What Next?
From: Proginoskes (proginoskes_at_email.msn.com)
Date: 04/20/05
- Next message: Nora Baron: "Re: Surrogate factoring, mapping, hyperbolas"
- Previous message: Proginoskes: "Re: Surrogate factoring, mapping, hyperbolas"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring Fails Completely, What Next?"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring Fails Completely, What Next?"
- Reply: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring Fails Completely, What Next?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 19 Apr 2005 18:54:27 -0700
jst...@msn.com wrote:
> [...]
> The SFT as a theorem is unique in terms of that approach to the
> factoring problem, showing that you can use rationals.
>
> I've stepped outside of the box.
And off the cliff.
You don't believe in moderation, do you? It always has to be one
extreme or another.
> Now, let's consider your claim as the SFT maps
> factors, and if it is not practical, then it maps
> factors in a biased way.
>
> But assume then that there is another theorem
> that does not.
Find it. And show that there IS a way to get NON-TRIVIAL factors. Then
people will listen to you for once.
> I've shown the concept.
Not all concepts pan out, though.
--- Christopher Heckman
- Next message: Nora Baron: "Re: Surrogate factoring, mapping, hyperbolas"
- Previous message: Proginoskes: "Re: Surrogate factoring, mapping, hyperbolas"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring Fails Completely, What Next?"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring Fails Completely, What Next?"
- Reply: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring Fails Completely, What Next?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|