Re: SF: Some basic facts

From: Randy Howard (randyhoward_at_FOOverizonBAR.net)
Date: 04/20/05


Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 01:04:27 GMT

In article <1113952354.733816.198860@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
jstevh@msn.com says...
> First off, I have the surrogate factoring theorem, also known as the
> SFT, which is a theorem.
>
> So, as a theorem, it can't be refuted.

I have the James Harris is a Crank theorem, also known as the JHiaC,
which is a theorem.

So, as a theorem, it can't be refuted.

> It's still a theorem, still an absolute, still absolutely true.

You're still a crank, still absolutely true.

> Yes, I can rely on "pure math" here, as the concept is just amazingly
> clever, even if it turns out it doesn't work.
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROTFLMAO That one goes into the Harris greatest hits.

-- 
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"Making it hard to do stupid things often makes it hard
 to do smart ones too." -- Andrew Koenig


Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring Fails Completely, What Next?
    ... what will James Harris do next? ... > The SFT can't be refuted. ... as far as producing useful factors, the techinques in the ... theorem are no better than picking possible factors at random. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: [JSH] Re: James Harris google group???
    ... >> Did someone take over James Harris' google group??? ... I've convinced myself that the surrogate factoring theorem isn't ... The total lack of evidence is the surest sign that the conspiracy is working. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: SF: National security
    ... >> will be sitting in front of some people asking you some very hard ... > James Harris ... >You are a loony. ... ,while SFT is not verified to work cut sci.crypt from replies. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: James Harris google group???
    ... William Rex Marshall wrote: ... >> Did someone take over James Harris' google group??? ... > Oh well, I've convinced myself that the surrogate factoring theorem isn't practical, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: A theorem cant be wrong
    ... > So the surrogate factoring theorem (SFT) cannot be wrong. ... > I like pushing away from the factoring problem to focus on the SFT ... there is the perfection of a ... > James Harris ...
    (sci.crypt)