Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring Fails Completely, What Next?

jstevh_at_msn.com
Date: 04/20/05 

Date: 19 Apr 2005 16:06:56 -0700

Lits O'Hate wrote:
> Now that the most recent mutation of surrogate "factoring" has been
> soundly refuted, what will James Harris do next?
>

The SFT can't be refuted. It's a theorem.

Now can it be proven to not possibly lead to anything practical?

Well, if so, it'd be pure math, then, now wouldn't it.

James Harris

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring Fails Completely, What Next?
    ... what will James Harris do next? ... > The SFT can't be refuted. ... as far as producing useful factors, the techinques in the ... theorem are no better than picking possible factors at random. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: SF: Some basic facts
    ... > First off, I have the surrogate factoring theorem, also known as the ... > SFT, which is a theorem. ... I have the James Harris is a Crank theorem, also known as the JHiaC, ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: SF: National security
    ... >> will be sitting in front of some people asking you some very hard ... > James Harris ... >You are a loony. ... ,while SFT is not verified to work cut sci.crypt from replies. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: A theorem cant be wrong
    ... > So the surrogate factoring theorem (SFT) cannot be wrong. ... > I like pushing away from the factoring problem to focus on the SFT ... there is the perfection of a ... > James Harris ...
    (sci.crypt)