Re: Now you can see, my "crank" status

From: Randy Howard (randyhoward_at_FOOverizonBAR.net)
Date: 04/18/05 

Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 21:51:52 GMT

In article <1113822155.914378.283400@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
jstevh@msn.com says...
> Now you can see from the surrogate factoring theorem, where I present
> some rather basic mathematics, and what it means, and posters start
> going to work to try and confuse the issue, ignoring repeated
> explanations.
>
> That's how they keep up the "crank" label, as it's not about what's
> correct, but a political game. It's like I'm fighting Republican
> commentators.

So ignore all the lowly plebeians and simply factor a big number
with your SF approach. That's all that it will take. A simple
demonstration for the naysayers, and you're on slashdot instantly.

Go for it. Amaze them all, prove you're not a crank.

> Now the SFT quite clearly connects rationals that are factors of two
> related numbers, and I've explained how you can have non-trivial
> rational factors by focusing on the integers that make up rationals.

So do it.

> The posters from sci.math who argue with me, could go over to Fox News
> as they demonstrate skills in the area of claiming to be "fair and
> balanced" while managing to avoid just about every single logical
> point, unless they wish to twist it.

Prove it.

> And think about how important the factoring problem is!!!

Exactly. It's irresponsible if you know of a way to solve it and
won't do so. You have a moral responsibility to the world to
factor some RSA class numbers if you can.

> Some of you may wish the politics could end but the politics are
> dragged in by my being a lone, eccentric discoverer who is fighting
> against a group of people who do not want to acknowledge the truth.

Then prove it works, and the truth will be apparent to all.

Here you go, factor every non-prime integer between 1,000,000 and
6.023x10**23, and do it today. Post your results, along with
an algorithm in some well-known language that duplicates your
answers.

> So who will exploit the information, like in the SFT?

If not you, then who else?

> Do you really think the entire world will not ever notice it?

If you, the "inventor" can't demonstrate it works, why should
anyone else bother?

> My guess is that people in "third world" countries or in other
> developed nations like France, Russia and Japan will exploit it,

My guess is that not a single person, anywhere on the planet,
including yourself, will ever demonstrate its usefulness. Prove
me wrong.

> You'll need to know that's where you have proven you belong--on the
> bottom of the world's social hierarchy of thinkers.

No need in being so self-deprecating James, after all, we know this
about you already. 

-- 
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"Making it hard to do stupid things often makes it hard
 to do smart ones too." -- Andrew Koenig

Relevant Pages

  • Re: So whats null then if its not nothing?
    ... Jon Heggland wrote: ... the standard has this to say: ... truth vale. ... commutative ring and rationals are a field. ...
    (comp.databases.theory)
  • Re: So whats null then if its not nothing?
    ... I meant NULLs generally, not truth values. ... > in reasoning, but if one looks at the integers, rationals, 3VLs as ... I think the way you used it was a bad analogy. ... assuming a strongly typed language.) ...
    (comp.databases.theory)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, room for error?
    ... >as that's an assertion of a truth. ... >Essentially I'm saying that there exists these two quadratics related ... but if in fact no rationals exist such that all ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, room for error?
    ... >as that's an assertion of a truth. ... >Essentially I'm saying that there exists these two quadratics related ... but if in fact no rationals exist such that all ...
    (sci.math)