Re: SF: Infinity proof

jstevh_at_msn.com
Date: 04/18/05 

Date: 17 Apr 2005 16:50:51 -0700

ošin wrote:
> The mathematics, however, doesn't indicate a preference for what we
can
> call trivial factors over what can be called non-trivial factors, as
> I've explained, so given your human choices, it's as likely to give
you
> non-trivial factors as trivial ones.
>
> The SFT does that? OK then how would it work out if you just guessed
at
> factors to start with, without SFT? I can just as easily cast your
point of
> view without SFT as follows: Randomly choosing x/y values doesn't
indicate a
> preference for what we can call trivial factors over what can be
called
> non-trivial factors, as you've explained, so given your human
choices, it's
> as likely to give you non-trivial factors as trivial ones.
>

How do you pick a random rational out of infinity?

You're not paying attention to the discussion, are you?

As other posters have also now been talking about how it's impossible
to randomly choose out of infinity.

The problem is solved with my work by human choice, as I explained in
the post you're so mindlessly replying to as you show here that you
aren't paying attention to what's being said.

You're just disagreeing.

James Harris