Re: SF: Areas of confusion, infinity
From: Bruce Stephens (bruce+usenet_at_cenderis.demon.co.uk)
Date: 04/14/05
- Next message: ošin: "Re: Areas of confusion, infinity"
- Previous message: guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de: "Re: Areas of confusion, infinity"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "SF: Areas of confusion, infinity"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: SF: Areas of confusion, infinity"
- Reply: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: SF: Areas of confusion, infinity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 21:10:28 +0100
jstevh@msn.com writes:
[...]
> Well, the surrogate factoring theorem links rational factorizations,
> but in so doing, it shows no inclination for trivial versus
> non-trivial factorizations.
Why not try it, then?
- Next message: ošin: "Re: Areas of confusion, infinity"
- Previous message: guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de: "Re: Areas of confusion, infinity"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "SF: Areas of confusion, infinity"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: SF: Areas of confusion, infinity"
- Reply: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: SF: Areas of confusion, infinity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Loading
