Re: Potential DoS on Bittorrent
From: none (_at_(none))
Date: 04/06/05
- Next message: Kevin Drapel: "Re: Is there any evidence of the Vatican using cryptography to communicate into Eastern Europe from 1946-1991?"
- Previous message: Gib Bogle: "Re: SF Theorem, practical?"
- In reply to: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Potential DoS on Bittorrent"
- Next in thread: Mack: "Re: Potential DoS on Bittorrent"
- Reply: Mack: "Re: Potential DoS on Bittorrent"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:06:33 +1200
Andrew Swallow wrote:
> Skybuck Flying wrote:
> [snip]
> I am surprised that the sub pieces do not have their own hash/CRC.
I believe that they do. Thats what i meant by a hash fail. A torrent can
have multiple files as well. The total size of a torrent can be as small
as a few megs but usually are 100's of megs and most are 1 gig or more.
I normally have between 2-8 clients that i download from and about 2
that i'm uploading too (Sometimes thay can be clients i'm also
downloading from). These clients are *very* dynamic in every sense.
Bit torrent was never designed for any kind of security unfortunately. I
would expect that there would quite a large number of potential DoS
attacks. But i don't that the one mentioned here is "practical" one.
Greg
- Next message: Kevin Drapel: "Re: Is there any evidence of the Vatican using cryptography to communicate into Eastern Europe from 1946-1991?"
- Previous message: Gib Bogle: "Re: SF Theorem, practical?"
- In reply to: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Potential DoS on Bittorrent"
- Next in thread: Mack: "Re: Potential DoS on Bittorrent"
- Reply: Mack: "Re: Potential DoS on Bittorrent"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|