Re: SF Theorem, practical?
From: Larry Hammick (larryhammick_at_OMIT-MEtelus.net)
Date: 04/06/05
- Next message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate Factoring Theorem"
- Previous message: D. J. Bernstein: "Re: Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ?"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "SF Theorem, practical?"
- Next in thread: Proginoskes: "Re: SF Theorem, practical?"
- Reply: Proginoskes: "Re: SF Theorem, practical?"
- Reply: Proginoskes: "Re: SF Theorem, practical?"
- Reply: Gib Bogle: "Re: SF Theorem, practical?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:41:57 GMT
<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1112659661.889204.282040@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> I've come up with a rather basic argument for why the surrogate
> factoring theorem probably should lead to a practical algorithm.
Should. Doesn't, but should.
This thread is typical JSH bull***. He fuddles about with a quadratic
equation, at some point factors something which is easy to factor,
and then groundlessly asserts that it's a step toward factoring M.
www.crank.net/megalomaniacs.html and click on "James Harris".
- Next message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate Factoring Theorem"
- Previous message: D. J. Bernstein: "Re: Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ?"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "SF Theorem, practical?"
- Next in thread: Proginoskes: "Re: SF Theorem, practical?"
- Reply: Proginoskes: "Re: SF Theorem, practical?"
- Reply: Proginoskes: "Re: SF Theorem, practical?"
- Reply: Gib Bogle: "Re: SF Theorem, practical?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]