Re: Not complicated, weird situation
From: Gonçalo Rodrigues (op73418_at_mail.telepac.pt)
Date: 04/05/05
- Next message: David Kastrup: "Re: Surrogate Factoring Theorem"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Not complicated, weird situation"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Not complicated, weird situation"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Not complicated, weird situation"
- Reply: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Not complicated, weird situation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:02:14 +0100
On 4 Apr 2005 19:33:00 -0700, jstevh@msn.com fed this fish to the
penguins:
[snip]
>Sure, none of you care about me, or the pressure I'm under. Can you
>imagine being in my situation?
>
It must be hard being you. But not for the reasons you state.
>I'm sure 99.9% of you would fall to pieces, to have incredible results
>and face such bizarre opposition.
>
>Maybe I'm getting a little nutty myself, but that's neither here nor
>there.
>
Maybe you should consider that hypothesis seriously. Maybe you are
nutty. Or, something milder maybe, as in... I don't know, a crank?
>Eventually the truth comes out, and as I posted earlier today, no
>matter what you may think it's not the end of the world.
>
It's not? And the Hammer? Pound us down with THE HAMMER! I Dare you!
>People will track you down. Reporters, lawyers, psychologists, and who
>knows who else as these people will want to know about the collective
>social breakdown that allowed this to happen.
>
>They will want to drag mathematicians into rooms to study you, figure
>you out, and find ways to convince themselves that they are not you
>that they could never do what you're doing now that they could never
>betray the world on this scale that they could never lie on this scale.
>
Tell me the truth. You've been in the mothership, haven't you? They
(you *know* who they are) have tested you, haven't they? Inserted
those horrible rectal probes. Master, master, are you the Blimp?
Best regards,
G. Rodrigues
- Next message: David Kastrup: "Re: Surrogate Factoring Theorem"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Not complicated, weird situation"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Not complicated, weird situation"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Not complicated, weird situation"
- Reply: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Not complicated, weird situation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|