Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm
mm_at_nospam.net
Date: 04/01/05
- Next message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring"
- Previous message: caleb.madrigal_at_gmail.com: "Re: Practical one-time pad variants"
- In reply to: Unruh: "Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm"
- Next in thread: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 02:38:43 +0200
Unruh wrote:
> Yes, assuming it was not obvious to one practiced in the art, (well, patent
> examiner's idea of what is obvious and most other people's can sometimes
> almost mutually exclusive), and assuming that it had not been
> patented/published/.. elsewhere.
Yes, that's why the One-Click Patent was granted. It was not
obvious and it was totally new. Who could have thought of clicking
on a button to get some effect? :-))
You are quoting rules but that's merely theoretical. Concretely
you can patent any triviality.
mm
- Next message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring"
- Previous message: caleb.madrigal_at_gmail.com: "Re: Practical one-time pad variants"
- In reply to: Unruh: "Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm"
- Next in thread: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]