sci.crypt
By Author

2421 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]

---

Starting: 02/28/05
Ending: 03/31/05

• A. Caspis
  • Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm (03/30/05)
• Abraham Buckingham
  • Re: My posting patterns, fewer threads (03/10/05)
• Adalan
  • Re: Encrypted files on computer as indication for guilt - where? (03/22/05)
• Administrator
  • New WWW Virtual Library Site on Digital Rights Management (03/17/05)
• afortuna_at_gmail.com
  • Re: need tips on cryptanalysis challenge (03/20/05)
• akohler
  • help (Vigenere ?) (03/17/05)
• Alan Balmer
  • Re: Reliable software (was Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/17/05)
  • Re: Reliable software (was Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/16/05)
• Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Mechanics (03/24/05)
  • Re: SF: Doesn't work? (03/01/05)
• amny
  • Re: Virtual Account Numbers (03/10/05)
  • re:Virtual Account Numbers (03/10/05)
• Amoula100
  • Navigation dans les tables enfants d'un DataGrid (03/10/05)
• Andrew Swallow
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/29/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/27/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/24/05)
  • Re: Encrypted files on computer as indication for guilt - where? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/19/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
  • Re: New WWW Virtual Library Site on Digital Rights Management (03/18/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/16/05)
  • Re: Reliable software (was Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/16/05)
  • Re: Crack in Computer Security Code Raises Red Flag (03/16/05)
  • Reliable software (was Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/16/05)
  • Re: Can't set CRC result by inital value? (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/08/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/03/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
• Anne & Lynn Wheeler
  • Re: xml-security vs. native security (03/29/05)
  • Re: xml-security vs. native security (03/29/05)
  • Re: xml-security vs. native security (03/29/05)
  • Re: xml-security vs. native security (03/28/05)
  • Re: xml-security vs. native security (03/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/27/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/27/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/22/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/22/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/22/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/22/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/16/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/16/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/16/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/16/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/16/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/16/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/16/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/15/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/14/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/14/05)
• Anonymous
  • Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/12/05)
• Antti Louko
  • Re: Idea for a slow block cipher with adjustable block length (03/31/05)
  • Idea for a slow block cipher with adjustable block length (03/30/05)
• Aquila
  • Enigma probable word attack (03/22/05)
  • Re: Enigma resources? (03/09/05)
  • Re: Enigma resources? (03/08/05)
  • Enigma resources? (03/07/05)
• arargh502NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Reliable software (was Thou shalt have no other gods before theANSI C stand (03/18/05)
• Arthur J. O'Dwyer
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/02/05)
• Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/13/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/08/05)
• Augustus SFX van Dusen
  • Looking for Triple DES CBC test vectors (03/03/05)
• Bartosz Zoltak
  • VMPC free (03/21/05)
  • Re: VMPC Data Security translation report (03/08/05)
  • Re: VMPC Data Security translation report (03/07/05)
  • Re: VMPC Data Security translation report (03/06/05)
  • VMPC Data Security translation report (03/05/05)
  • Re: Best way to salt RC4? (03/05/05)
• beliavsky_at_aol.com
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/02/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
• Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/29/05)
• Bernd Felsche
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
• BigDaddyD
  • We are experts in decryption, we can help! (03/01/05)
• BigWhiteMouse
  • re:A5/1 not cracked? (03/29/05)
  • a question about the random subgraph attack (03/29/05)
  • an estimatin for the random subgraph attack (03/29/05)
  • the probability is about 0.06 (03/28/05)
  • implementing the simplified attack of Thomas Pornin (03/25/05)
• Bill Leary
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/26/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
• Bill Pechter Carolyn Pechter
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/17/05)
• Bill Unruh
  • Re: hardware rng with feedback (03/17/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/08/05)
• blmblm_at_myrealbox.com
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/24/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/24/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/15/05)
• boattug
  • Re: Reverse engineering surrogate factoring (03/03/05)
• Bob Deblier
  • Re: Book list? (03/14/05)
• Bob Jenkins
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/09/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/08/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/05/05)
• BRG
  • Re: GCM spec (03/20/05)
  • Re: GCM spec (03/19/05)
  • Re: GCM spec (03/19/05)
  • Re: CCM mode? (03/13/05)
  • Re: CCM mode? (03/13/05)
  • Re: Large-numbers division way too slow -- what to do? (03/10/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/02/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/02/05)
• Brian Boutel
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/02/05)
• Brian Hetrick
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/13/05)
  • Re: file encryption utils (03/11/05)
• Brian Inglis
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/27/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/27/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/27/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/24/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/24/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/17/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/17/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Reliable software (was Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Reliable software (was Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/14/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/13/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/08/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/07/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/05/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/04/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/04/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/02/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/02/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/02/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/02/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (02/28/05)
• Brownout
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ (03/28/05)
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ (03/27/05)
• Bruce Stephens
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/31/05)
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/30/05)
  • Re: xml-security vs. native security (03/29/05)
  • Re: xml-security vs. native security (03/28/05)
  • Re: xml-security vs. native security (03/28/05)
  • Re: Attacking surrogate factoring (03/25/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder (03/22/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/09/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/07/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Interchangeability of Hashing and Encrypting (03/06/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/04/05)
• Bryan Olson
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/24/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/24/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Inside an abandoned NSA monitoring station (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Help with Simple Text Decryption (03/14/05)
  • Re: Help with Simple Text Decryption (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/13/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/13/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/13/05)
  • Re: Coefficients in Shamir's Secret Sharing (03/13/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/12/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/12/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
• bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring, Problem Solved (03/26/05)
• C. Bond
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/30/05)
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/30/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Mechanics (03/27/05)
  • Re: Attacking surrogate factoring (03/26/05)
  • Re: Attacking surrogate factoring (03/26/05)
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/26/05)
  • Re: Attacking surrogate factoring (03/25/05)
  • Re: Simplifying discussion on surrogate factoring (03/23/05)
  • Re: Ellipse versus hyperbola, surrogate factoring (03/23/05)
  • Re: Ellipse versus hyperbola, surrogate factoring (03/22/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder (03/22/05)
  • Re: Ellipse versus hyperbola, surrogate factoring (03/20/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/11/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: Checking my logic, surrogate factoring (03/10/05)
  • Re: Corrected surrogate factoring algorithm (03/10/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/10/05)
  • Re: My posting patterns, fewer threads (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/09/05)
  • Re: Corrected surrogate factoring algorithm (03/09/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/08/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/08/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/08/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/07/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/06/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Checking my logic, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Checking my logic, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/04/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/04/05)
  • Re: Reverse engineering surrogate factoring (03/03/05)
• Carlos Moreno
  • Re: Random Number Generator (03/23/05)
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/22/05)
  • Re: file encryption utils (03/11/05)
  • Re: Large-numbers division way too slow -- what to do? (03/10/05)
  • Large-numbers division way too slow -- what to do? (03/09/05)
  • Re: Interchangeability of Hashing and Encrypting (03/06/05)
  • Re: Interchangeability of Hashing and Encrypting (03/06/05)
  • Interchangeability of Hashing and Encrypting (03/05/05)
  • Re: favorite programming languages (03/02/05)
• Casper H.S. Dik
  • Re: Decrypting wireless (802.11) packets when you know the cleartext (03/18/05)
• CBFalconer
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/31/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/24/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/24/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/18/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/17/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/16/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Reliable software (was Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/16/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/04/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/04/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/04/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/02/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/02/05)
  • X-No-archive considered harmful (was: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?) (03/02/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
• Charles Shannon Hendrix
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
• Charlie Gibbs
  • Re: Reliable software (was Thou shalt have no other gods before theANSI C stand (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Reliable software (was Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSIC stand (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
• Chris Card
  • Re: Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ? (03/29/05)
• Christian Bau
  • Re: Corrected surrogate factoring algorithm (03/09/05)
• claudevms_at_attbi.com
  • Re: write files to unpartitioned space (03/15/05)
• Cobb
  • Password Management Schemes (03/07/05)
• Colin Andrew Percival
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/19/05)
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/18/05)
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/17/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/17/05)
• Colin J Denman
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/06/05)
• Craig A. Finseth
  • Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
• Craig Feinstein
  • Re: 1wayfx challenge (03/31/05)
  • Re: 1wayfx challenge (03/30/05)
  • 1wayfx challenge (03/30/05)
  • Re: Shanks' class group factorization algorithm. (03/14/05)
  • Shanks' class group factorization algorithm. (03/14/05)
• Cristiano
  • [ANN] New version of RaBiGeTe and RaBiGeTe GUI (03/31/05)
  • Mitzenmacher's AMLS unbiaser (03/07/05)
• CryptWolf
  • Re: Sorted dictionary attack (03/29/05)
  • Re: Sorted dictionary attack (03/28/05)
  • Re: Sorted dictionary attack (03/26/05)
• D. J. Bernstein
  • Re: Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography (03/31/05)
  • Re: Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ? (03/30/05)
  • Re: Poly1305-AES (03/28/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/27/05)
  • Re: Poly1305-AES (03/27/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/27/05)
  • Re: Poly1305-AES (03/27/05)
  • Re: Poly1305-AES (03/27/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/27/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/27/05)
  • Re: What is next in line (03/18/05)
  • Re: Finding MD5 Collisions - a Toy For a Notebook (03/10/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/02/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/02/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/02/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/02/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/02/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits (03/01/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (02/28/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (02/28/05)
  • Re: "T-Functions" (02/28/05)
• Damien
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/30/05)
  • Re: Conjugate Factoring [CF] Superior to any JSH dreg (03/26/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
• Dan Evans
  • Re: Theory of Everything (03/02/05)
• Daniel McLaury
  • Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring, Problem Solved (03/24/05)
• Daniele Raffo
  • Re: Cipher, cipher, pants on fire! (03/15/05)
• Dave
  • Re: My posting patterns, fewer threads (03/10/05)
• Dave Rusin
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/08/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/02/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/01/05)
• Dave Thompson
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/07/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/07/05)
• Dave Turner
  • Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography (03/26/05)
  • Re: Inaccuracy of ANSI clock() as ?-RNG (03/26/05)
  • Re: Help needed on checksum algorithm (03/20/05)
  • Re: PC software to encrypt credit card numbers? (03/17/05)
  • Re: What is next in line (03/17/05)
  • Re: What is next in line (03/16/05)
  • Re: Hrmmm.. (03/15/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/14/05)
  • Hrmmm.. (03/14/05)
  • Re: XOR (03/14/05)
  • Re: XOR (03/14/05)
  • XOR (03/14/05)
  • Re: Help with Simple Text Decryption (03/13/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Algorithm (03/08/05)
  • Re: Software for breaking trivial ciphers? (03/04/05)
  • Software for breaking trivial ciphers? (03/04/05)
• Dave Vandervies
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
• David A. Scott
  • Re: Correction to 47 bit to 10 letter code (03/08/05)
  • re: Need help decoding cipher (03/07/05)
  • Re: Correction to 47 bit to 10 letter code (03/07/05)
  • Re: Correction to 47 bit to 10 letter code (03/06/05)
  • Re: Mr B G W (03/02/05)
• david bandel
  • Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder (03/22/05)
• David C. Ullrich
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/30/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/07/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Checking my logic, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
• David Eather
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ (03/29/05)
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ (03/28/05)
  • Re: PC software to encrypt credit card numbers? (03/24/05)
  • Re: hardware rng with feedback (03/19/05)
  • Re: cryptography in fiction (03/19/05)
  • Re: hardware rng with feedback (03/18/05)
  • Re: hardware rng with feedback (03/17/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/11/05)
  • Re: Finding MD5 Collisions - a Toy For a Notebook (03/10/05)
  • Re: Finding MD5 Collisions - a Toy For a Notebook (03/09/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/09/05)
  • Re: SF: Sign change (03/09/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/09/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/09/05)
  • Re: Need help decoding cipher (03/07/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/06/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/06/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Augmenting 128-bit to 256-bit? (03/03/05)
  • Re: SF: Doesn't work? (02/28/05)
  • Re: SHA-1 Believed Broken according to Schneier (02/28/05)
• David Hamer
  • Re: Enigma resources? (03/08/05)
• David Kastrup
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/30/05)
  • Re: Corrected surrogate factoring algorithm (03/27/05)
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/26/05)
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/26/05)
  • Re: Attacking surrogate factoring (03/26/05)
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/26/05)
• David Wagner
  • Re: Hash compression. (03/31/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/31/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/30/05)
  • Re: a question about the random subgraph attack (03/29/05)
  • Re: Secure MAC using Block Cipher? (03/28/05)
  • Re: Secure MAC using Block Cipher? (03/28/05)
  • Re: Secure MAC using Block Cipher? (03/28/05)
  • Re: Secure MAC using Block Cipher? (03/28/05)
  • Re: Secure MAC using Block Cipher? (03/28/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/26/05)
  • Re: A5/1 not cracked? (03/25/05)
  • Re: implementing the simplified attack of Thomas Pornin (03/25/05)
  • Re: implementing the simplified attack of Thomas Pornin (03/25/05)
  • Re: A5/1 not cracked? (03/25/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/25/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/25/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/25/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/24/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/24/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/24/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Mix-net (03/21/05)
  • Re: Microcontroller Flash loader "ready", comments? (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: What is next in line (03/19/05)
  • Re: Microcontroller Flash loader "ready", comments? (03/19/05)
  • Re: Microcontroller Flash loader "ready", comments? (03/18/05)
  • Re: Microcontroller Flash loader "ready", comments? (03/18/05)
  • Re: Mix-net (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: a question about linear functions (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Analysis of MySQL hash algorithm? (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Analysis of MySQL hash algorithm? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Analysis of MySQL hash algorithm? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/13/05)
  • Re: Tiny, simple solution for microcontroller flash loader? (03/06/05)
  • Re: Tiny, simple solution for microcontroller flash loader? (03/05/05)
  • Re: Best way to salt RC4? (03/04/05)
  • Re: Tiny, simple solution for microcontroller flash loader? (03/04/05)
  • Re: Best way to salt RC4? (03/04/05)
  • Re: Best way to salt RC4? (03/04/05)
  • Re: Tiny, simple solution for microcontroller flash loader? (03/03/05)
  • Re: Tiny, simple solution for microcontroller flash loader? (03/03/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/02/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/02/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/02/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/02/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Looking for algorithm (03/01/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: A5/1 not cracked? (03/01/05)
  • Re: A5/1 not cracked? (03/01/05)
  • Re: LFSR and byte diffusion? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Looking for algorithm (03/01/05)
  • Re: A5/1 not cracked? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: On the wisdom of using Public Keys as IDs in a DHT. (03/01/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits (02/28/05)
• david.florman_at_att.net
  • Re: beale (03/03/05)
  • Re: beale (03/03/05)
  • Re: beale (03/03/05)
  • Re: beale (03/02/05)
  • beale (03/02/05)
• deneb
  • c2 block cipher as used in cppm (03/30/05)
• Don Chiasson
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
• Douglas A. Gwyn
  • Re: The Greatest News Ever! (03/30/05)
  • Re: Inaccuracy of ANSI clock() as ?-RNG (03/26/05)
  • Re: Inaccuracy of ANSI clock() as ?-RNG (03/26/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/23/05)
  • Re: Inside an abandoned NSA monitoring station (03/23/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/22/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/22/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/22/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/22/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/22/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/22/05)
  • Re: Two Stage AES (03/22/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/21/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/18/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/18/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/17/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/17/05)
  • Re: Can I distinguish ciphertext by what kind of rule? (03/16/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Short encryption (03/14/05)
  • Re: file encryption utils (03/14/05)
  • Re: Enigma resources? (03/14/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/12/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/09/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/08/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/08/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/08/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/08/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/08/05)
  • Re: beale (03/03/05)
  • Re: Theory of Everything (03/02/05)
  • Re: beale (03/02/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/02/05)
  • Re: Identifying method of encryption or format (03/02/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/02/05)
  • favorite programming languages (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
  • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. (02/28/05)
• Douglas Wikström
  • Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/17/05)
• Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho
  • Re: Anyone benchmarked SSE2 bitsliced Serpent? (03/31/05)
  • Re: SHA-1 collisions (03/31/05)
  • Re: SHA-1 collisions (03/25/05)
  • Re: Coppersmith attacks (03/21/05)
  • Re: Coppersmith attacks (03/20/05)
  • Re: Finding MD5 Collisions - a Toy For a Notebook (03/07/05)
  • Re: Finding MD5 Collisions - a Toy For a Notebook (03/07/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Finding MD5 Collisions Q?= a Toy For a Notebook (03/06/05)
  • Re: SF: Quadratic residues (03/02/05)
  • Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits (03/01/05)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory (02/28/05)
• edddy
  • Re: Need help decoding cipher (03/07/05)
  • Re: A Wolfienstein Class Algorithm (03/03/05)
  • Re: A Wolfienstein Class Algorithm (03/02/05)
  • Re: A Wolfienstein Class Algorithm (03/02/05)
  • A Wolfienstein Class Algorithm (03/02/05)
  • Re: Can you break this code? (03/02/05)
  • Re: Can you break this code? (03/02/05)
  • Re: Identifying method of encryption or format (03/02/05)
  • Re: Identifying method of encryption or format (03/02/05)
  • Re: A challenge...! (03/02/05)
  • Re: A challenge...! (03/02/05)
  • Re: Can you break this code? (03/02/05)
  • Re: Can you break this code? (03/02/05)
  • Re: Can you break this code? (03/02/05)
  • Re: Need help decoding cipher (03/02/05)
  • Re: Need help decoding cipher (03/02/05)
  • The Beale Screamer (03/02/05)
  • Re: Need help decoding cipher (03/02/05)
  • Re: Need help decoding cipher (03/02/05)
  • Re: Need help decoding cipher (03/02/05)
  • Re: very easy chiffre (03/02/05)
  • Re: very easy chiffre (03/02/05)
• Edward G. Nilges
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/22/05)
• el_roachmeister_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: PC software to encrypt credit card numbers? (03/27/05)
  • Re: PC software to encrypt credit card numbers? (03/24/05)
  • Re: PC software to encrypt credit card numbers? (03/24/05)
  • Re: PC software to encrypt credit card numbers? (03/21/05)
  • Re: PC software to encrypt credit card numbers? (03/18/05)
  • PC software to encrypt credit card numbers? (03/16/05)
• Eris Pluvia
  • Re: Hotbits strategy questions (03/09/05)
• Erland
  • Re: Vote Buying/Selling and Absentee Voting???? (03/11/05)
  • Vote Buying/Selling and Absentee Voting???? (03/09/05)
  • Vote Buying/Selling and Absentee Voting???? (03/09/05)
  • Re: May be a Bogus puzzle!!!!! (03/06/05)
  • May be a Bogus puzzle!!!!! (03/05/05)
• Erwann ABALEA
  • Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm (03/31/05)
  • Re: Twofish / Rijndael versus Known-plaintext-attack (03/14/05)
  • Re: pair of valid X.509 certificates with identical signatures! (03/03/05)
  • Re: pair of valid X.509 certificates with identical signatures! (03/03/05)
• Fab
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/10/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/09/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/09/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/08/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/08/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/08/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/07/05)
  • How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/07/05)
• Felix Rawlings
  • Re: Hyperbolic surrogate factoring, algorithm? (03/20/05)
  • Re: My posting patterns, fewer threads (03/10/05)
  • Re: Checking my logic, surrogate factoring (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
  • Re: Reverse engineering surrogate factoring (03/03/05)
  • Re: favorite programming languages (03/02/05)
• Finnish chick
  • Thank you (03/16/05)
  • Cipher, cipher, pants on fire! (03/15/05)
• fishfry
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/27/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/09/05)
  • Re: SF: Sign change (03/09/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/03/05)
• fiziwig
  • Re: JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring (03/13/05)
  • Re: JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring (03/12/05)
  • Re: JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring (03/12/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Algorithm (03/08/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/04/05)
• flip
  • Re: Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography (03/27/05)
  • Re: Attacking surrogate factoring (03/26/05)
  • Re: Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography (03/26/05)
  • Re: Triple-AES, NIST and RNGs (03/24/05)
  • Re: Triple-AES, NIST and RNGs (03/24/05)
  • Triple-AES, NIST and RNGs (03/24/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder (03/22/05)
  • Re: Ellipse versus hyperbola, surrogate factoring (03/20/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Algorithm (03/09/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/04/05)
• fozzy3276_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: Need help decoding cipher (03/07/05)
  • Need help decoding cipher (03/02/05)
• Francois Grieu
  • Re: Large-numbers division way too slow -- what to do? (03/10/05)
  • Re: Large-numbers division way too slow -- what to do? (03/10/05)
• Frank Jansen
  • Re: A5/1 not cracked? (03/02/05)
  • Re: A5/1 not cracked? (03/02/05)
  • A5/1 not cracked? (03/01/05)
• fred fish
  • Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder (03/22/05)
  • Re: Crypto puzzles (03/14/05)
  • Re: Help with Simple Text Decryption (03/13/05)
• Fruhwirth Clemens
  • Re: MD6 Proposal - Discrete Round, The new construction hash function with Provable Security (03/12/05)
• Gadi Evron
  • half-OT: Tel Aviv University GSM weaknesses lectures - Sunday (13/3) (03/11/05)
• Gene Wirchenko
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/26/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/26/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/24/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/24/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Reliable software (was Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/12/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/06/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/06/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/02/05)
• gerard46
  • Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder (03/22/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/01/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/01/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (02/28/05)
• Gerry Quinn
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/31/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/30/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/29/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/29/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/23/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/20/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/19/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/17/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/16/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/16/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/16/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/15/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/15/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/15/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/14/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/13/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/12/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/11/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/09/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/09/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/08/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/08/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/07/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/06/05)
• Gianna Stefani
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring, The Way of the Future! (03/24/05)
  • Re: Inside an abandoned NSA monitoring station (03/22/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/12/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/11/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/08/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/08/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/07/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/07/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • Re: USB Memory Key EDncryption (03/06/05)
  • Re: Software for breaking trivial ciphers? (03/04/05)
  • Re: Software for breaking trivial ciphers? (03/04/05)
  • Re: Need help decoding cipher (03/02/05)
  • Re: Need help decoding cipher (03/02/05)
  • Re: favorite programming languages (03/01/05)
  • Re: A challenge...! (02/28/05)
• Gib Bogle
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/31/05)
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/30/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder (03/22/05)
  • Re: Ellipse versus hyperbola, surrogate factoring (03/20/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/16/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/16/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/16/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/16/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/16/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/16/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/07/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
• Giox
  • On montgomery multiplication without final subtraction (03/30/05)
• glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: String hashing (03/04/05)
• Goro
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/12/05)
• Gregory G Rose
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/31/05)
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/31/05)
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ (03/29/05)
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ (03/28/05)
  • Re: Secure MAC using Block Cipher? (03/28/05)
  • Re: A5/1 not cracked? (03/25/05)
  • Re: Need help to understand roots of Galois polynomials (03/25/05)
  • Re: Microcontroller Flash loader "ready", comments? (03/19/05)
  • Re: What is next in line (03/19/05)
  • Re: What is next in line (03/19/05)
  • Re: What is next in line (03/19/05)
  • Re: help (Vigenere ?) (03/17/05)
  • Re: Can't set CRC result by inital value? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Crypto puzzles (03/14/05)
  • Re: Coefficients in Shamir's Secret Sharing (03/12/05)
  • Re: Is there such a thing as modular cryptography for GSM celluar telephony? (03/11/05)
  • Re: Best way to salt RC4? (03/08/05)
  • Re: Best way to salt RC4? (03/08/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/08/05)
  • Re: Finding MD5 Collisions - a Toy For a Notebook (03/07/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • Re: VMPC Data Security translation report (03/06/05)
  • Re: Tiny, simple solution for microcontroller flash loader? (03/04/05)
  • Re: Best way to salt RC4? (03/04/05)
  • Re: A5/1 not cracked? (03/01/05)
  • Re: LFSR and byte diffusion? (03/01/05)
• Grumble
  • Re: Anyone benchmarked SSE2 bitsliced Serpent? (03/30/05)
  • Re: Anyone benchmarked SSE2 bitsliced Serpent? (03/30/05)
  • Re: SHA-1 collisions (03/29/05)
  • Re: Use of LibTomMath (LTM 0.35) (03/25/05)
  • Re: SHA-1 collisions (03/25/05)
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/24/05)
  • Re: Shacal decryption algorithm needed (03/23/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/22/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/22/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/22/05)
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/18/05)
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/18/05)
  • Re: Correction to 47 bit to 10 letter code (03/08/05)
• gswork_at_mailcity.com
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/16/05)
  • Re: X-No-archive considered harmful (03/03/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/02/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/02/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/01/05)
• guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de
  • Re: Attacking surrogate factoring (03/25/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: My posting patterns, fewer threads (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/08/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
• Hank Oredson
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/27/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/27/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/27/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/26/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/24/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/24/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/17/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Reliable software (was Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/07/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/02/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
• Henrick Hellström
  • Re: What is next in line (03/16/05)
• Hi Ho Silver
  • Re: cryptography in fiction (03/21/05)
• Hiski Haapoja
  • Re: "The Net" - my life has been like that life of Angela Bennet in the movie "The Net" (03/22/05)
• Hovav Shacham
  • Re: Passwords and offline guessing attacks?? (03/01/05)
• Igor Tebelev
  • SHA1 Question (03/31/05)
• Ilya
  • Re: Implementations of Paillier Encryption (03/19/05)
  • Re: Implementations of Paillier Encryption (03/18/05)
  • Implementations of Paillier Encryption (03/15/05)
• infobahn
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/16/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/16/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/15/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/15/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/09/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/08/05)
• IPGrunt
  • Re: Crack in Computer Security Code Raises Red Flag (03/16/05)
• Ivan Voras
  • Re: What is next in line (03/19/05)
  • Re: What is next in line (03/18/05)
• Jack Peacock
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
• Jacob Sheehy
  • Re: Book list? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Crypto puzzles (03/14/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/14/05)
  • cryptography in fiction (03/13/05)
  • Re: Help with Simple Text Decryption (03/13/05)
  • Re: My posting patterns, fewer threads (03/10/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/06/05)
  • Re: Software for breaking trivial ciphers? (03/04/05)
• James E.
  • Re: Random Number Generator (03/23/05)
• james_at_enliva.com
  • Random Number Generator (03/22/05)
• Jan Panteltje
  • Re: Just wondering why the U.S. government has stopped hunting down Osama bin Laden ? (03/19/05)
  • Re: New WWW Virtual Library Site on Digital Rights Management (03/18/05)
  • Re: New WWW Virtual Library Site on Digital Rights Management (03/17/05)
  • Re: New WWW Virtual Library Site on Digital Rights Management (03/17/05)
  • Re: New WWW Virtual Library Site on Digital Rights Management (03/17/05)
  • Re: Reversibly Censor Images (03/16/05)
  • Re: write files to unpartitioned space (03/13/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/12/05)
  • NSA achieve completely open for Austria! (03/03/05)
  • Re: X-No-archive considered harmful (03/03/05)
  • Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits (03/01/05)
  • Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits (02/28/05)
• jasminesmithhome_at_yahoo.co.uk
  • neo-fascist sex fantasies at ncipher corporation (03/19/05)
  • sexy phone fun at ncipher corporation (03/19/05)
• JBO Software
  • Classic Cipher software (03/04/05)
• Jean-Luc Cooke
  • Re: Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography (03/30/05)
  • Re: Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ? (03/30/05)
  • Re: Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography (03/30/05)
  • Re: Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ? (03/29/05)
  • Re: Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ? (03/29/05)
  • Re: Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ? (03/29/05)
  • Re: SHA-1 collisions (03/28/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/24/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring, The Way of the Future! (03/24/05)
  • Re: Random Number Generator (03/23/05)
  • Re: Random Number Generator (03/22/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/22/05)
  • Re: Difference of squares, SF (03/22/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/22/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/22/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/21/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/21/05)
  • Re: Two Stage AES (03/21/05)
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/18/05)
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/18/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/17/05)
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/17/05)
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/17/05)
  • Re: RSA (03/17/05)
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/16/05)
  • Re: re:Reversibly Censor Images (03/16/05)
  • Re: Reversibly Censor Images (03/16/05)
  • Re: MD5 Question (03/15/05)
  • Re: A Wolfienstein Class Algorithm (03/03/05)
  • Re: beale (03/02/05)
  • Re: pair of valid X.509 certificates with identical signatures! (03/02/05)
  • Re: TomsFastMath ... faster (02/28/05)
• Jean-Marc Bourguet
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/31/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
• Jeremy Boden
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/11/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/10/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/09/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/08/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/02/05)
• Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: X-No-archive considered harmful (03/03/05)
• Jim
  • Re: cryptography in fiction (03/21/05)
• Jim Gillogly
  • Re: help (Vigenere ?) (03/18/05)
  • Re: Cipher, cipher, pants on fire! (03/16/05)
  • Re: Cipher, cipher, pants on fire! (03/15/05)
  • Re: Cipher, cipher, pants on fire! (03/15/05)
  • Re: cryptanalysis of incomplete columnar transposition cipher (03/11/05)
  • Re: Enigma resources? (03/09/05)
  • Re: Enigma resources? (03/08/05)
  • Re: Enigma resources? (03/07/05)
  • re: Need help decoding cipher (03/07/05)
  • Re: Need help decoding cipher (03/04/05)
• Jim Haynes
  • Old telegram in code (03/21/05)
• Jim Spriggs
  • Re: Corrected surrogate factoring algorithm (03/27/05)
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/27/05)
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/26/05)
  • Re: Difference of squares, SF (03/22/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/02/05)
• JiXian Yang
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/27/05)
  • Making Hash Function different (03/27/05)
  • Making Hash Function different (03/27/05)
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/21/05)
• JJQ
  • pair of valid X.509 certificates with identical signatures! (03/01/05)
• Jmbi
  • Re: Simplifying discussion on surrogate factoring (03/23/05)
• jmfbahciv_at_aol.com
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/16/05)
• jmorriss_at_idirect.com
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
• Jmuby
  • Re: Ellipse versus hyperbola, surrogate factoring (03/20/05)
• Joe C
  • Re: USB Memory Key EDncryption (03/06/05)
• Joe Peschel
  • Re: Hash compression. (03/31/05)
  • Re: Sorted dictionary attack (03/29/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/29/05)
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ (03/28/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/24/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/21/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/21/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/21/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/21/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/21/05)
  • Re: "The Net" - my life has been like that life of Angela Bennet in the movie "The Net" - MARKS = MARX - Osama bin Laden (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: need tips on cryptanalysis challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • re:puzzle (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: puzzle (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: help (Vigenere ?) (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: help (Vigenere ?) (03/17/05)
  • Re: help (Vigenere ?) (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: help with cipher (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: help with cipher (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Can I distinguish ciphertext by what kind of rule? (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Hrmmm.. (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Best way to salt RC4? (03/08/05)
  • Re: Best way to salt RC4? (03/08/05)
  • Re: Need help decoding cipher (03/08/05)
  • Re: Software for breaking trivial ciphers? (03/04/05)
  • Re: Theory of Everything (03/02/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
• Joe Soap
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/12/05)
• Johannes Verelst
  • Re: Twofish / Rijndael versus Known-plaintext-attack (03/14/05)
  • Twofish / Rijndael versus Known-plaintext-attack (03/14/05)
• John
  • Re: RSA (03/17/05)
  • RSA (03/17/05)
  • Re: Seeking Encryption Software Referals (03/02/05)
  • Re: Seeking Encryption Software Referals (03/02/05)
• John A. Malley
  • Re: Book list? (03/14/05)
  • Re: cryptography in fiction (03/14/05)
  • Re: Theory of Everything (03/02/05)
  • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. (02/28/05)
• John Bailey
  • Re: cryptography in fiction (03/14/05)
• John Hairell
  • Re: Inside an abandoned NSA monitoring station (03/23/05)
  • Re: Inside an abandoned NSA monitoring station (03/22/05)
• John Savard
  • Re: Correction to 47 bit to 10 letter code (03/08/05)
  • Re: Correction to 47 bit to 10 letter code (03/08/05)
  • Correction to 47 bit to 10 letter code (03/06/05)
  • Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits (02/28/05)
• John Schutkeker
  • Re: Sorted dictionary attack (03/29/05)
  • Re: Sorted dictionary attack (03/28/05)
  • Re: Sorted dictionary attack (03/28/05)
  • Re: Sorted dictionary attack (03/27/05)
  • Re: Sorted dictionary attack (03/27/05)
  • Re: Sorted dictionary attack (03/26/05)
  • Re: Sorted dictionary attack (03/26/05)
  • Re: Sorted dictionary attack (03/26/05)
  • Re: Sorted dictionary attack (03/26/05)
  • Sorted dictionary attack (03/26/05)
• John Smith
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/29/05)
  • Re: Encrypted files on computer as indication for guilt - where? (03/24/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder (03/22/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder (03/22/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/02/05)
• john_ramsden_at_sagitta-ps.com
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/27/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (02/28/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (02/28/05)
• Johnson
  • Re: Incorrect equations (03/26/05)
  • Re: Attacking surrogate factoring (03/25/05)
• Jon
  • Re: Crack in Computer Security Code Raises Red Flag (03/17/05)
• Joseph Hertzlinger
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/20/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/20/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/14/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/14/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/14/05)
• joshuat_at_gmail.com
  • Re: new crypto product (03/18/05)
• José Carlos Santos
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/26/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/05/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/05/05)
• jshsucks_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: Need help to understand roots of Galois polynomials (03/27/05)
• jstevh_at_hotmail.com
  • Re: SF: Sign change (03/09/05)
• jstevh_at_msn.com
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/31/05)
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/31/05)
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/31/05)
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/31/05)
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/30/05)
  • Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/30/05)
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/27/05)
  • Re: Conics, surrogate factoring, early failures (03/27/05)
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/27/05)
  • Re: Corrected surrogate factoring algorithm (03/26/05)
  • Re: Attacking surrogate factoring (03/26/05)
  • SF: Incorrect equations (03/26/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Mechanics (03/26/05)
  • Re: Attacking surrogate factoring (03/26/05)
  • Re: Attacking surrogate factoring (03/26/05)
  • Attacking surrogate factoring (03/25/05)
  • Conics, surrogate factoring, early failures (03/25/05)
  • Re: Hyperbolic surrogate factoring, algorithm? (03/24/05)
  • Re: Difference of squares, SF (03/24/05)
  • Re: Hyperbolic surrogate factoring, algorithm? (03/24/05)
  • Surrogate Factoring Mechanics (03/24/05)
  • Re: Difference of squares, SF (03/23/05)
  • Simplifying discussion on surrogate factoring (03/23/05)
  • Surrogate factoring, correcting sign problems (03/23/05)
  • Re: Ellipse versus hyperbola, surrogate factoring (03/23/05)
  • Difference of squares, SF (03/22/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder (03/22/05)
  • Re: Ellipse versus hyperbola, surrogate factoring (03/22/05)
  • Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder (03/22/05)
  • Re: Ellipse versus hyperbola, surrogate factoring (03/20/05)
  • Hyperbolic surrogate factoring, algorithm? (03/20/05)
  • Ellipse versus hyperbola, surrogate factoring (03/20/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/11/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: Checking my logic, surrogate factoring (03/10/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/10/05)
  • Re: Corrected surrogate factoring algorithm (03/09/05)
  • My posting patterns, fewer threads (03/09/05)
  • Corrected surrogate factoring algorithm (03/09/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/09/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/09/05)
  • Re: SF: Sign change (03/09/05)
  • Re: SF: Sign change (03/09/05)
  • SF: Sign change (03/09/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Algorithm (03/09/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/09/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Algorithm (03/09/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/08/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/08/05)
  • Surrogate Factoring Algorithm (03/08/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/07/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/07/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
  • Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/06/05)
  • SF: Simpler derivation (03/05/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/05/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/05/05)
  • Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Checking my logic, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Checking my logic, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/04/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/04/05)
  • Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/04/05)
  • Reverse engineering surrogate factoring (03/03/05)
  • SF: Quadratic residues (03/02/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated (03/02/05)
• Jumbie
  • Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder (03/22/05)
• Jumby
  • Re: My posting patterns, fewer threads (03/10/05)
  • Re: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
• jun
  • hi what crypto library are you using? (03/06/05)
• Justin
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/30/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • Re: SF: Quadratic residues (03/02/05)
• Justin Davis
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/08/05)
  • Re: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
• Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: Inaccuracy of ANSI clock() as ?-RNG (03/28/05)
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/28/05)
  • Re: Inaccuracy of ANSI clock() as ?-RNG (03/28/05)
  • Re: Inaccuracy of ANSI clock() as ?-RNG (03/26/05)
  • Re: Inaccuracy of ANSI clock() as ?-RNG (03/26/05)
  • Re: Inaccuracy of ANSI clock() as ?-RNG (03/26/05)
  • Re: Inaccuracy of ANSI clock() as ?-RNG (03/26/05)
  • Re: Inaccuracy of ANSI clock() as ?-RNG (03/26/05)
  • Inaccuracy of ANSI clock() as ?-RNG (03/25/05)
  • Re: Encrypted files on computer as indication for guilt - where? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Encrypted files on computer as indication for guilt - where? (03/21/05)
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/21/05)
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/20/05)
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/20/05)
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/18/05)
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/18/05)
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/16/05)
  • Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/16/05)
  • Re: Cipher, cipher, pants on fire! (03/15/05)
• K Williams
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
• karllarc
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Mechanics (03/25/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Mechanics (03/25/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Mechanics (03/25/05)
  • Re: Hyperbolic surrogate factoring, algorithm? (03/24/05)
  • Re: Ellipse versus hyperbola, surrogate factoring (03/23/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder (03/22/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder (03/22/05)
  • Re: Ellipse versus hyperbola, surrogate factoring (03/20/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/12/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/12/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/06/05)
• ke'iko
  • A + B + Y = X s/b B + Y = X - Y (03/10/05)
• Kevin
  • Re: Book list? (03/19/05)
  • Re: Decrypting wireless (802.11) packets when you know the cleartext (03/19/05)
• Kevin Drapel
  • Re: Simplifying discussion on surrogate factoring (03/23/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/12/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/12/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/12/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/08/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • Re: TomsFastMath ... faster (03/02/05)
• Kim Hyldgaard
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/18/05)
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/17/05)
  • Re: What is next in line (03/17/05)
  • Re: What is next in line (03/17/05)
  • Re: What is next in line (03/16/05)
  • What is next in line (03/16/05)
  • Nessie (03/16/05)
• King Frog
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/07/05)
• kladko_at_bkpsecurity.com
  • Re: HMAC-SHA-512 test vectors (03/18/05)
• Klaus Pommerening
  • Re: cryptography in fiction (03/14/05)
  • Re: Enigma resources? (03/09/05)
• klaus1
  • very easy chiffre (03/01/05)
• Knight Rush
  • Does KEA have a provable security? (03/09/05)
• Koger
  • Re: file encryption utils (03/14/05)
  • file encryption utils (03/11/05)
• Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/31/05)
  • Re: Hash compression. (03/31/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/31/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/31/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/31/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/31/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/30/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/30/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/30/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/30/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/30/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/30/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/30/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/29/05)
  • Re: Implementations of Paillier Encryption (03/29/05)
  • Re: Implementations of Paillier Encryption (03/17/05)
  • Re: does point halving in combo with ECIES cause security problems? (03/03/05)
• kufudo
  • re:file encryption utils (03/20/05)
  • re:need tips on cryptanalysis challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: re:puzzle (03/20/05)
  • Re: need tips on cryptanalysis challenge (03/20/05)
  • Re: need tips on cryptanalysis challenge (03/20/05)
  • re:need tips on cryptanalysis challenge (03/20/05)
  • need tips on cryptanalysis challenge (03/20/05)
• Kwiatek
  • problems with round key in DES KS (03/18/05)
• Lady Chatterly
  • Re: Difference of squares, SF (03/24/05)
• Larry Elmore
  • Re: Reliable software (was Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/02/05)
• Larry Hammick
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring, Problem Solved (03/24/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • Re: SF: Quadratic residues (03/02/05)
• Larry Lard
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/31/05)
  • Re: My posting patterns, fewer threads (03/10/05)
• Lash Rambo
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/27/05)
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/27/05)
• Lawrence Statton N1GAK/XE2
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
• Lee Rudolph
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/09/05)
• Lee, Ho Jung
  • Thank you for replying my foolish question~. (03/18/05)
  • Can I distinguish ciphertext by what kind of rule? (03/16/05)
• Lefty
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
• Lenny G.
  • Re: very easy chiffre (03/01/05)
  • Re: On the wisdom of using Public Keys as IDs in a DHT. (03/01/05)
  • On the wisdom of using Public Keys as IDs in a DHT. (03/01/05)
• lin
  • a question about linear functions (03/17/05)
• Lits O'Hate
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
• litsohate_at_hotmail.com
  • Re: JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring (03/10/05)
• lowrid
  • can any one tell me what encryption this is (03/06/05)
• Luke Goh
  • To Beale Screamer (03/24/05)
• Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder (03/22/05)
• lynn_at_garlic.com
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/08/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/05/05)
• Mack
  • Re: Triple-AES, NIST and RNGs (03/24/05)
  • Re: Triple-AES, NIST and RNGs (03/24/05)
• Marco Coppola
  • Re: cryptography in fiction (03/14/05)
• Marco S Hyman
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
• Mark Atherton
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/06/05)
• Mark Nudelman
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/09/05)
• Markus Jansson
  • Re: Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography (03/26/05)
  • Re: Snake oil in PGP or just a bug? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Just wondering why the U.S. government has stopped hunting down Osama bin Laden ? (03/19/05)
• Martin Bodenstedt
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
• Martin Carpenter
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/22/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/21/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/21/05)
• Martin Kahlert
  • Re: Encrypted files on computer as indication for guilt - where? (03/22/05)
  • Encrypted files on computer as indication for guilt - where? (03/21/05)
• Martin1703
  • Relationship between two numbers (03/21/05)
• Matrix
  • re:Crypto puzzles (03/18/05)
  • re:Book list? (03/15/05)
  • Book list? (03/14/05)
  • re:Crypto puzzles (03/14/05)
  • Crypto puzzles (03/14/05)
• Matt
  • Re: Two Stage AES (03/21/05)
  • Re: Reversibly Censor Images (03/16/05)
  • Re: cryptography in fiction (03/14/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Enigma resources? (03/08/05)
• Matt Curtin
  • Re: Book list? (03/24/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/24/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/23/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/23/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/21/05)
• Matt Mahoney
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/21/05)
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/18/05)
  • Re: Compressing hash strings into two directions - hashing idea (03/16/05)
  • Re: Can I distinguish ciphertext by what kind of rule? (03/16/05)
  • Re: Does KEA have a provable security? (03/10/05)
  • Re: Interchangeability of Hashing and Encrypting (03/06/05)
• Max Power
  • suggestions needed: agent to local hq, using MW or FM band to transmit information (03/31/05)
  • Cryptography for GSM celluar telephony -- aka is GSM crypto upgradable/futureproof ...? (03/12/05)
  • Modular cryptography for GSM celluar telephony -- aka is GSM crypto upgradable/futureproof ...? (03/11/05)
  • Is there such a thing as modular cryptography for GSM celluar telephony? (03/11/05)
• Maynard
  • Re: help with cipher (03/16/05)
• mc1719
  • Help needed on checksum algorithm (03/20/05)
• mechmech
  • Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm (03/30/05)
  • Re: Conjugate Factoring [CF] Superior to any JSH dreg (03/25/05)
• mensanator_at_aol.com
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/09/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
• mensanator_at_aol.compost
  • Re: JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring (03/13/05)
  • Re: JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring (03/13/05)
  • Re: JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring (03/12/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/11/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/10/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/10/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/08/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/06/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/06/05)
  • Re: Reverse engineering surrogate factoring (03/03/05)
• Michael
  • Re: Help decrypting (03/25/05)
  • Need help to understand roots of Galois polynomials (03/25/05)
• Michael Amling
  • Re: Hash compression. (03/31/05)
  • Re: suggestions needed: agent to local hq, using MW or FM band to transmit information (03/31/05)
  • Re: SHA1 Question (03/31/05)
  • Re: Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ? (03/30/05)
  • Re: Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ? (03/30/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/29/05)
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ (03/29/05)
  • Re: Inaccuracy of ANSI clock() as ?-RNG (03/28/05)
  • Re: Inaccuracy of ANSI clock() as ?-RNG (03/28/05)
  • Re: Inaccuracy of ANSI clock() as ?-RNG (03/26/05)
  • Re: Twofish / Rijndael versus Known-plaintext-attack (03/14/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/14/05)
  • Re: Coefficients in Shamir's Secret Sharing (03/12/05)
  • Re: Enigma resources? (03/09/05)
  • Re: Looking for algorithm (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
• Michael Brown
  • Re: looking for a fast, reversible array randomizing algorithm (03/23/05)
• Michael Schmidt
  • Re: Decrypting wireless (802.11) packets when you know the cleartext (03/20/05)
• Micheal H. McCabe
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
• Mike
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/14/05)
• Mike Gonzalez
  • Re: RSA .crt and .key file formats? (03/05/05)
  • RSA .crt and .key file formats? (03/04/05)
• Mike Oliver
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/26/05)
  • Re: SF: Sign change (03/10/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/08/05)
• Mike Scott
  • Coppersmith attacks (03/20/05)
• Min_at_mygaff0.demon.co.uk
  • Re: cryptography in fiction (03/14/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
• mm_at_nospam.net
  • Re: VMPC free (03/28/05)
  • Re: Shanks' class group factorization algorithm. (03/22/05)
• Moe Trin
  • Re: want to search for anyone in the world? Feel curious to know who might be searching for you? (03/30/05)
  • Re: Vote Buying/Selling and Absentee Voting???? (03/11/05)
• mooyix_at_gmail.com
  • MySQL challenge authentication attack (03/16/05)
  • Re: Analysis of MySQL hash algorithm? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Analysis of MySQL hash algorithm? (03/14/05)
  • Re: write files to unpartitioned space (03/13/05)
  • Re: RC6 Key scheduler. (03/13/05)
  • Analysis of MySQL hash algorithm? (03/13/05)
• Morten Reistad
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/30/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
• MrPepper11
  • Crack in Computer Security Code Raises Red Flag (03/15/05)
• Mxsmanic
  • Re: SHA1 Question (03/31/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/15/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/13/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/13/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/12/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/12/05)
• MyHaz
  • Re: Just wondering why the U.S. government has stopped hunting down Osama bin Laden ? (03/19/05)
• myhotline_at_gmail.com
  • Re: Passwords and offline guessing attacks?? (03/01/05)
• myleftarmitches_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/06/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/05/05)
• N. Durner
  • Coefficients in Shamir's Secret Sharing (03/12/05)
• nate.keith_at_gmail.com
  • Cypto or Puzzle? argh (03/31/05)
• Nathan
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
• navi_routes
  • re:Enig3 (03/30/05)
  • Enig3 (03/27/05)
• Ned Latham
  • Re: X-No-archive considered harmful (was: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?) (03/03/05)
• nemo outis
  • Re: file encryption utils (03/11/05)
• none
  • Re: Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography (03/30/05)
  • Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm (03/30/05)
  • Re: Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography (03/30/05)
• nyarltep
  • Re: Just wondering why the U.S. government has stopped hunting down Osama bin Laden ? (03/19/05)
• Oliver Betz
  • Re: Microcontroller Flash loader "ready", comments? (03/21/05)
  • Re: Microcontroller Flash loader "ready", comments? (03/20/05)
  • Re: Microcontroller Flash loader "ready", comments? (03/19/05)
  • Re: Microcontroller Flash loader "ready", comments? (03/19/05)
  • Re: Microcontroller Flash loader "ready", comments? (03/18/05)
  • Microcontroller Flash loader "ready", comments? (03/18/05)
  • Re: Can't set CRC result by inital value? (03/15/05)
  • Re: Can't set CRC result by inital value? (03/15/05)
  • Can't set CRC result by inital value? (03/14/05)
  • Cheap modification detection (MDC) for firmware loader (03/10/05)
  • Re: Best way to salt RC4? (03/08/05)
  • Re: Tiny, simple solution for microcontroller flash loader? (03/07/05)
  • Re: Tiny, simple solution for microcontroller flash loader? (03/06/05)
  • RC5 licensing (03/05/05)
  • Re: Tiny, simple solution for microcontroller flash loader? (03/05/05)
  • Re: Tiny, simple solution for microcontroller flash loader? (03/04/05)
  • Re: Tiny, simple solution for microcontroller flash loader? (03/04/05)
  • Re: Best way to salt RC4? (03/04/05)
  • Re: Best way to salt RC4? (03/04/05)
  • Re: Tiny, simple solution for microcontroller flash loader? (03/04/05)
  • Re: Tiny, simple solution for microcontroller flash loader? (03/03/05)
  • Tiny, simple solution for microcontroller flash loader? (03/03/05)
  • Re: LFSR and byte diffusion? (03/01/05)
  • Re: LFSR and byte diffusion? (03/01/05)
  • Re: LFSR and byte diffusion? (03/01/05)
  • Re: LFSR and byte diffusion? (03/01/05)
  • Re: LFSR and byte diffusion? (03/01/05)
  • Re: LFSR and byte diffusion? (03/01/05)
  • LFSR and byte diffusion? (03/01/05)
• Oppie
  • Re: My posting patterns, fewer threads (03/13/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/13/05)
• oðin
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/31/05)
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/31/05)
  • Re: Simplifying discussion on surrogate factoring (03/23/05)
  • Re: Ellipse versus hyperbola, surrogate factoring (03/20/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: Corrected surrogate factoring algorithm (03/09/05)
  • Re: Corrected surrogate factoring algorithm (03/09/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Algorithm (03/08/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/08/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Algorithm (03/08/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/08/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/04/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/04/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/04/05)
  • Re: Reverse engineering surrogate factoring (03/03/05)
• pascal_at_go.ro
  • Re: Short encryption (03/16/05)
  • Short encryption (03/14/05)
• pass_at_myrealbox.com
  • DRM2WMV (03/27/05)
• Patrick
  • Re: SHA-1 collisions (03/25/05)
  • Re: Help decrypting (03/25/05)
  • Re: SHA-1 collisions (03/25/05)
  • SHA-1 collisions (03/25/05)
  • Re: new student to crypology question (03/22/05)
  • Re: new student to crypology question (03/22/05)
  • new student to crypology question (03/19/05)
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/18/05)
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/17/05)
• Patrick Scheible
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/04/05)
• Paul Cooper
  • Re: write files to unpartitioned space (03/15/05)
• Paul Leyland
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/30/05)
• Paul Murray
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
• Paul Rubin
  • Re: SHA1 Question (03/31/05)
  • Re: Idea for a slow block cipher with adjustable block length (03/31/05)
  • Re: Idea for a slow block cipher with adjustable block length (03/31/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/31/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/30/05)
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/30/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/30/05)
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/30/05)
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/30/05)
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/30/05)
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/29/05)
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/29/05)
  • Re: xml-security vs. native security (03/28/05)
  • Re: Secure MAC using Block Cipher? (03/28/05)
  • Re: Secure MAC using Block Cipher? (03/28/05)
  • Re: Secure MAC using Block Cipher? (03/28/05)
  • Re: Anyone benchmarked SSE2 bitsliced Serpent? (03/27/05)
  • Re: Anyone benchmarked SSE2 bitsliced Serpent? (03/27/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/27/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/27/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/26/05)
  • Anyone benchmarked SSE2 bitsliced Serpent? (03/26/05)
  • Re: PC software to encrypt credit card numbers? (03/24/05)
  • Re: Inside an abandoned NSA monitoring station (03/23/05)
  • Re: Inside an abandoned NSA monitoring station (03/22/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Snake oil in PGP or just a bug? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: PC software to encrypt credit card numbers? (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: What is next in line (03/19/05)
  • Re: What is next in line (03/19/05)
  • Re: PC software to encrypt credit card numbers? (03/19/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/17/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/17/05)
  • Re: Crack in Computer Security Code Raises Red Flag (03/16/05)
  • Re: cryptography in fiction (03/14/05)
  • Re: Enigma resources? (03/09/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
• Pavel Vondruska
  • Finding MD5 Collisions – a Toy For a Notebook (03/06/05)
• Pawel Jakub Dawidek
  • Re: Hash compression. (03/31/05)
  • Hash compression. (03/31/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/31/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/31/05)
  • Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/24/05)
• pepsi_cola40
  • Help with Simple Text Decryption (03/13/05)
• Per Leslie Jensen
  • Re: Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ? (03/30/05)
  • Re: Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ? (03/29/05)
  • Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ? (03/29/05)
• Pete Fenelon
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
• petela_at_gocougs.wsu.edu
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/31/05)
  • Re: Use of LibTomMath (LTM 0.35) (03/25/05)
  • Re: Use of LibTomMath (LTM 0.35) (03/25/05)
  • Re: Use of LibTomMath (LTM 0.35) (03/25/05)
  • Re: Use of LibTomMath (LTM 0.35) (03/24/05)
  • Re: Use of LibTomMath (LTM 0.35) (03/24/05)
  • Re: Use of LibTomMath (LTM 0.35) (03/24/05)
  • Use of LibTomMath (LTM 0.35) (03/23/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/17/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/17/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/17/05)
  • Static version of bignum library (03/17/05)
• Peter
  • Re: file encryption utils (03/12/05)
• Peter Flass
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/31/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/24/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/08/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
• Peter Gutmann
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/02/05)
• Peter Pearson
  • Re: Help with Simple Text Decryption (03/14/05)
  • Re: Help with Simple Text Decryption (03/13/05)
  • Re: pair of valid X.509 certificates with identical signatures! (03/02/05)
  • Re: pair of valid X.509 certificates with identical signatures! (03/02/05)
• Peter Wozniak
  • Re: HMAC-SHA-512 test vectors (03/18/05)
• Phil Carmody
  • Re: VMPC free (03/27/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/27/05)
  • Re: VMPC free (03/26/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/26/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/26/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/26/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/13/05)
• PowerPoster1
  • Re: file encryption utils (03/18/05)
• Prai Jei
  • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated (03/05/05)
• prep_at_prep.synonet.com
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
• Privacy Nut
  • Re: xml-security vs. native security (03/28/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/15/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/14/05)
• Professor P
  • Re: SHA-1 collisions (03/25/05)
• Proginoskes
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/09/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/07/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/07/05)
• Programmer Dude
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/30/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/29/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/29/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
• proper_unit_at_yahoo.com
  • JSH: Surrogate Factoring, Problem Solved (03/24/05)
• Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm (03/31/05)
  • Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm (03/31/05)
  • Re: 1wayfx challenge (03/30/05)
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/30/05)
  • Re: Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ? (03/30/05)
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/30/05)
  • Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm (03/30/05)
  • Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm (03/30/05)
  • Re: Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ? (03/29/05)
  • Re: (",) Do You Want To Know For Sure You Are Going To Heaven? (03/25/05)
  • Re: Encrypted files on computer as indication for guilt - where? (03/23/05)
  • Re: Encrypted files on computer as indication for guilt - where? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Crack in Computer Security Code Raises Red Flag (03/16/05)
  • Re: Offline authentication using Securid: Insecure? (03/14/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/14/05)
  • Re: cryptography in fiction (03/14/05)
  • Re: Shanks' class group factorization algorithm. (03/14/05)
  • Re: Large-numbers division way too slow -- what to do? (03/10/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/09/05)
  • Re: How Cryptographers Assign their Probabilities? (03/07/05)
  • Re: can any one tell me what encryption this is (03/07/05)
• quantumgecko
  • Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm (03/31/05)
  • Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm (03/30/05)
  • A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm (03/30/05)
• Ralph Hilton
  • Re: Microcontroller Flash loader "ready", comments? (03/21/05)
• rand007_at_gmail.com
  • PKI book (03/30/05)
• Randy Howard
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/31/05)
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/31/05)
  • Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring (03/31/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring, Problem Solved (03/26/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/05/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/02/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/02/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/02/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/02/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/02/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/01/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/01/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/01/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/01/05)
  • Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits (03/01/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/01/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/01/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/01/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/01/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (02/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
• Randy Poe
  • Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder (03/22/05)
• Richard Henry
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: Checking my logic, surrogate factoring (03/06/05)
• Richard Steiner
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
• Rick D.
  • looking for a fast, reversible array randomizing algorithm (03/19/05)
• Rick Decker
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Algorithm (03/09/05)
  • Re: Corrected surrogate factoring algorithm (03/09/05)
  • Re: SF: Sign change (03/09/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Algorithm (03/08/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/04/05)
• rleone_at_hotmail.com
  • Re: cryptography in fiction (03/14/05)
• Rob Warnock
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
• Robert Israel
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/03/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/02/05)
• Robert Mischke
  • Re: Best way to salt RC4? (03/08/05)
  • Re: Best way to salt RC4? (03/08/05)
  • Re: Best way to salt RC4? (03/08/05)
  • Best way to salt RC4? (03/03/05)
• Roger Schlafly
  • Re: Book list? (03/29/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/29/05)
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ (03/28/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/28/05)
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ (03/28/05)
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ (03/28/05)
  • Crypto Mini-FAQ (03/27/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/26/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/26/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/25/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/25/05)
  • Re: SHA-1 collisions (03/25/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/24/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/24/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/24/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/24/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/24/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/23/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/23/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/22/05)
  • Re: Book list? (03/21/05)
  • Re: Coppersmith attacks (03/20/05)
  • Re: Some random questions from a crypt newbie (03/13/05)
  • Crypto Mini-FAQ (03/04/05)
• Roger Willcocks
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/22/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/21/05)
• Rohan
  • cryptanalysis of incomplete columnar transposition cipher (03/10/05)
• Roland Hutchinson
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
• rpl
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/26/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/23/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/19/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/14/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
• rukmani
  • steganography project..... (03/05/05)
• Rune Christensen
  • hardware rng with feedback (03/17/05)
• rzel1123_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/29/05)
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/28/05)
  • Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/28/05)
• Sal
  • Some random questions from a crypt newbie (03/13/05)
• sammy
  • Re: The Greatest News Ever! (03/30/05)
  • Re: VMPC free (03/28/05)
  • Re: VMPC free (03/28/05)
  • Re: VMPC free (03/27/05)
  • Re: VMPC Data Security translation report (03/08/05)
  • Re: VMPC Data Security translation report (03/06/05)
  • Re: VMPC Data Security translation report (03/06/05)
  • Re: VMPC Data Security translation report (03/06/05)
• samson
  • Re: Decrypting wireless (802.11) packets when you know the cleartext (03/20/05)
  • Decrypting wireless (802.11) packets when you know the cleartext (03/18/05)
• Scott A Crosby
  • Re: String hashing (03/04/05)
• Scott Contini
  • Re: Coppersmith attacks (03/21/05)
• ScottD
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Mechanics (03/25/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Mechanics (03/25/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Mechanics (03/25/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Mechanics (03/25/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/12/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/11/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/11/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/06/05)
• searcher
  • USB Memory Key EDncryption (03/06/05)
• SecQrilious
  • Just wondering why the U.S. government has stopped hunting down Osama bin Laden ? (03/19/05)
• securenix
  • xml-security vs. native security (03/28/05)
  • Re: Mix-net (03/21/05)
  • Mix-net (03/18/05)
• Serge Vaudenay
  • Mycrypt 2005 CFP (submission deadline extended) (03/23/05)
• Shannon Appel
  • [SSL-Talk List FAQ] Secure Sockets Layer Discussion List FAQ v1.1.1 (03/30/05)
• sherry
  • Two Stage AES (03/21/05)
  • MD5 Question (03/15/05)
• sidd_at_situ.com
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
• Siddharth
  • RC6 test vectors.. (03/13/05)
• sidsiv_at_gmail.com
  • RC6 Key scheduler. (03/13/05)
• Simon Johnson
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/22/05)
  • Re: XOR (03/14/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/13/05)
  • Re: I'm either stupid.. (03/06/05)
  • I'm either stupid.. (03/06/05)
• skearney_at_accessbee.com
  • Re: OT: qwdrfy encryption (03/12/05)
  • OT: qwdrfy encryption (03/06/05)
• somebody_at_somewhere.net
  • Re: cryptography in fiction (03/17/05)
• Soundspider
  • Re: file encryption utils (03/12/05)
• spinoza1111_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/20/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/20/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/19/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/19/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/19/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/19/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/18/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/16/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/16/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/16/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/16/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/16/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/15/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/15/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/15/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/15/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/15/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/14/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/13/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/11/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/11/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/11/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/10/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/10/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/09/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/08/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/08/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/07/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/06/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/03/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/03/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/02/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/02/05)
• srprozak_at_gmail.com
  • Identifying method of encryption or format (03/02/05)
• Stan Barr
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/27/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/25/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/24/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/20/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
• Stephen K. Gielda
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/12/05)
• Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/31/05)
• Steve O'Hara-Smith
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/22/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/21/05)
  • Re: Reliable software (was Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/17/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/16/05)
  • Re: Reliable software (was Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/09/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
• Steven
  • Snake oil in PGP or just a bug? (03/22/05)
• superuser
  • Re: VMPC free (03/27/05)
  • Re: VMPC free (03/26/05)
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/18/05)
  • Re: XOR (03/14/05)
• Terje Mathisen
  • Re: Correction to 47 bit to 10 letter code (03/08/05)
  • Re: Correction to 47 bit to 10 letter code (03/07/05)
  • Re: Correction to 47 bit to 10 letter code (03/06/05)
• Thad Smith
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/17/05)
• The Brigadier
  • "The Net" - my life has been like that life of Angela Bennet in the movie "The Net" - MARKS = MARX - Osama bin Laden (03/21/05)
• The Last Danish Pastry
  • Re: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
• Thomas Pornin
  • Re: implementing the simplified attack of Thomas Pornin (03/25/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/23/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/22/05)
  • Re: RSA .crt and .key file formats? (03/04/05)
  • Re: pair of valid X.509 certificates with identical signatures! (03/03/05)
  • Re: A5/1 not cracked? (03/01/05)
  • Re: A5/1 not cracked? (03/01/05)
  • Re: A5/1 not cracked? (03/01/05)
• Tim Peters
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/13/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/11/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Algorithm (03/08/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/07/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/07/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/06/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/05/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/04/05)
  • Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring (03/04/05)
  • Re: Reverse engineering surrogate factoring (03/03/05)
  • Re: Reverse engineering surrogate factoring (03/03/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/02/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/01/05)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory (03/01/05)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory (03/01/05)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory (02/28/05)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory (02/28/05)
• Tim Tyler
  • Inside an abandoned NSA monitoring station (03/22/05)
• Timothy Murphy
  • Re: Need help to understand roots of Galois polynomials (03/25/05)
• tngu3014
  • re:puzzle (03/18/05)
  • puzzle (03/18/05)
  • help with cipher (03/16/05)
• Tobias Wendorff
  • Re: write files to unpartitioned space (03/16/05)
  • Re: write files to unpartitioned space (03/13/05)
  • write files to unpartitioned space (03/13/05)
• Tom Linden
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
• Tom St Denis
  • Re: Anyone benchmarked SSE2 bitsliced Serpent? (03/31/05)
  • Re: Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography (03/31/05)
  • Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm (03/30/05)
  • Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm (03/30/05)
  • Re: 1wayfx challenge (03/30/05)
  • Re: Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography (03/30/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/30/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/30/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/30/05)
  • Re: Anyone benchmarked SSE2 bitsliced Serpent? (03/30/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/30/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/30/05)
  • Re: Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography (03/30/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/30/05)
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/30/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/30/05)
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/30/05)
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/30/05)
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/30/05)
  • Re: Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ? (03/30/05)
  • Re: Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ? (03/29/05)
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/29/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/29/05)
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/29/05)
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/29/05)
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/29/05)
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/29/05)
  • Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ (03/28/05)
  • Re: Poly1305-AES (03/28/05)
  • Re: SHA-1 collisions (03/28/05)
  • Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results (03/28/05)
  • Re: Secure MAC using Block Cipher? (03/27/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/27/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/27/05)
  • Re: Poly1305-AES (03/27/05)
  • Re: Poly1305-AES (03/27/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/27/05)
  • Re: Making Hash Function different (03/27/05)
  • Re: PolyMAC-1305 [was Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors]] (03/27/05)
  • PolyMAC-1305 [was Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors]] (03/27/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/27/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/27/05)
  • Re: Anyone benchmarked SSE2 bitsliced Serpent? (03/27/05)
  • Re: Anyone benchmarked SSE2 bitsliced Serpent? (03/27/05)
  • Re: Anyone benchmarked SSE2 bitsliced Serpent? (03/27/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/27/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/27/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/27/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/27/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/26/05)
  • Re: Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/26/05)
  • Pelican MAC [speed and vectors] (03/26/05)
  • Re: VMPC free (03/25/05)
  • Re: VMPC free (03/25/05)
  • Re: SHA-1 collisions (03/25/05)
  • Re: Use of LibTomMath (LTM 0.35) (03/25/05)
  • Re: Use of LibTomMath (LTM 0.35) (03/25/05)
  • Re: Use of LibTomMath (LTM 0.35) (03/25/05)
  • Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring, Problem Solved (03/24/05)
  • Re: Use of LibTomMath (LTM 0.35) (03/24/05)
  • Re: Hyperbolic surrogate factoring, algorithm? (03/24/05)
  • Re: Use of LibTomMath (LTM 0.35) (03/24/05)
  • Re: Disk/Partition level encryption. (03/24/05)
  • Re: Difference of squares, SF (03/24/05)
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/24/05)
  • Re: Difference of squares, SF (03/24/05)
  • Re: Triple-AES, NIST and RNGs (03/24/05)
  • Re: Triple-AES, NIST and RNGs (03/24/05)
  • Re: Use of LibTomMath (LTM 0.35) (03/24/05)
  • Re: GCM spec (03/23/05)
  • Re: 3DES on a network card: Intel Pro/100S (03/22/05)
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/22/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/22/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/22/05)
  • Re: Relationship between two numbers (03/21/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/21/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/21/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/21/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/21/05)
  • Re: "The Net" - my life has been like that life of Angela Bennet in the movie "The Net" - MARKS = MARX - Osama bin Laden (03/21/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/21/05)
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/21/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/21/05)
  • Re: "The Net" - my life has been like that life of Angela Bennet in the movie "The Net" - MARKS = MARX - Osama bin Laden (03/21/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/21/05)
  • Re: GCM spec (03/20/05)
  • Re: GCM spec (03/20/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/19/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/19/05)
  • Re: GCM spec (03/19/05)
  • GCM spec (03/19/05)
• tomicmilan_at_gmail.com
  • Re: PKI: the end (03/21/05)
  • PKI: the end (03/21/05)
• tomstdenis_at_gmail.com
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/18/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/18/05)
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/18/05)
  • Re: hardware rng with feedback (03/17/05)
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/17/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/17/05)
  • Re: Standalone SHA-256 or 512 (03/17/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/17/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/17/05)
  • Re: Crack in Computer Security Code Raises Red Flag (03/16/05)
  • Re: Crack in Computer Security Code Raises Red Flag (03/16/05)
  • Re: CCM mode? (03/16/05)
  • Re: Crack in Computer Security Code Raises Red Flag (03/15/05)
  • Re: CCM mode? (03/13/05)
  • Re: CCM mode? (03/13/05)
  • Re: CCM mode? (03/13/05)
  • CCM mode? (03/13/05)
  • Re: Modular cryptography for GSM celluar telephony -- aka is GSM crypto upgradable/futureproof ...? (03/12/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/12/05)
  • Re: Navigation dans les tables enfants d'un DataGrid (03/11/05)
  • Re: MD6 Proposal - Discrete Round, The new construction hash function with Provable Security (03/11/05)
  • Re: Large-numbers division way too slow -- what to do? (03/10/05)
  • Re: Large-numbers division way too slow -- what to do? (03/10/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/07/05)
  • Re: TomsFastMath ... faster (03/03/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/02/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/02/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: LFSR and byte diffusion? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? (03/01/05)
  • Re: LFSR and byte diffusion? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated (02/28/05)
  • Re: TomsFastMath ... faster (02/28/05)
  • Re: "T-Functions" (02/28/05)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory (02/28/05)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory (02/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
• Trevor L. Jackson, III
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/18/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/17/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/16/05)
  • Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Reliable software (was Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/15/05)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore? (03/13/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/02/05)
  • Re: LFSR and byte diffusion? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: LFSR and byte diffusion? (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/01/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (02/28/05)
• Tuna Lover
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard (03/16/05)
• Unruh
  • Re: SHA-1 collisions (03/31/05)
  • Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm (03/30/05)
  • Re: Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography (03/30/05)
  • Re: Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography (03/30/05)
  • Re: Naive Square root algorithm for GNFS ? (03/29/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/29/05)
  • Re: Inaccuracy of ANSI clock() as ?-RNG (03/26/05)
  • Re: Inaccuracy of ANSI clock() as ?-RNG (03/26/05)
  • Re: Sorted dictionary attack (03/26/05)
  • Re: SHA-1 collisions (03/25/05)
• unruh-spam_at_physics.ubc.ca
  • Re: Encrypted files on computer as indication for guilt - where? (03/22/05)
• Utthaman
  • [ICSEng'05] Final CFP - due date March 10, 2005 (03/04/05)
• Valery Pryamikov
  • Re: Book list? (03/15/05)
  • Re: Twofish / Rijndael versus Known-plaintext-attack (03/15/05)
• Van Chocstraw
  • Re: VMPC free (03/28/05)
  • Re: VMPC free (03/27/05)
  • Re: VMPC free (03/27/05)
  • Re: VMPC free (03/25/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Mechanics (03/25/05)
  • Re: VMPC free (03/25/05)
  • Conjugate Factoring [CF] Superior to any JSH dreg (03/25/05)
• vedaal
  • Re: What is next in line (03/18/05)
  • Re: What is next in line (03/17/05)
  • Re: USB Memory Key EDncryption (03/06/05)
• Vedat Hallac
  • Re: Looking for algorithm (03/01/05)
  • Re: Looking for algorithm (03/01/05)
  • Re: Looking for algorithm (02/28/05)
• Vic Drastik
  • Re: cryptography in fiction (03/19/05)
• vic-something_at_sympatico.ca
  • 3DES on a network card: Intel Pro/100S (03/21/05)
• Vladimir Shabanov
  • Re: My solution to chess grandmaster problem in zero knowledge proofs of identity. (03/07/05)
  • Re: My solution to chess grandmaster problem in zero knowledge proofs of identity. (03/04/05)
• Vlastimil Klima
  • Re: Finding MD5 Collisions - a Toy For a Notebook (03/08/05)
  • Re: Finding MD5 Collisions - a Toy For a Notebook (03/07/05)
  • Re: Finding MD5 Collisions - a Toy For a Notebook (03/07/05)
  • Re: Finding MD5 Collisions - a Toy For a Notebook (03/07/05)
  • Re: Finding MD5 Collisions - a Toy For a Notebook (03/07/05)
• Volcs
  • re:Reversibly Censor Images (03/16/05)
  • Reversibly Censor Images (03/16/05)
• Volker Hetzer
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/31/05)
  • Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm (03/30/05)
  • Re: Incorrect equations (03/29/05)
  • Re: SF: Incorrect equations (03/29/05)
• Wannabee
  • Re: Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography (03/30/05)
  • Surrogate Factoring, The Way of the Future! (03/24/05)
  • Re: "The Net" - my life has been like that life of Angela Bennet in the movie "The Net" - MARKS = MARX - Osama bin Laden (03/21/05)
  • Re: new student to crypology question (03/21/05)
• Wayne Brown
  • Re: SF: Sign change (03/11/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: SF: Sign change (03/10/05)
  • Re: SF: Experimental mathematics (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/10/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, complete theory (03/07/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result (03/07/05)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory (03/01/05)
• websnarf_at_gmail.com
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/19/05)
  • Re: Static version of bignum library (03/17/05)
  • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/06/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/02/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/02/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/01/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/01/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/01/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (03/01/05)
  • Re: String hashing (was: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard) (02/28/05)
  • Re: String hashing (02/28/05)
• Will
  • A secure 'verifiable' file signing method for distributing trusted files (03/10/05)
• Will Ryu
  • Hotbits strategy questions (03/06/05)
• Will Dickson
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? (03/07/05)
• Will Twentyman
  • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated (02/28/05)
• William Hughes
  • Re: Attacking surrogate factoring (03/26/05)
  • Re: Simplifying discussion on surrogate factoring (03/23/05)
  • Re: Ellipse versus hyperbola, surrogate factoring (03/23/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/12/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/11/05)
  • Re: Surrogate Factoring Solution (03/10/05)
  • Re: SF: Simpler derivation (03/06/05)
• Wolfgang Ehrhardt
  • SHACAL-2 test vectors for CBC, CFB, CTR, OFB? (03/26/05)
• yjx0310
  • Re: MD6 Proposal - Discrete Round, The new construction hash function with Provable Security (03/11/05)
  • MD6 Proposal - Discrete Round, The new construction hash function with Provable Security (03/11/05)
• zoshka_at_buziaczek.pl
  • Shacal decryption algorithm needed (03/22/05)

Last message date: 03/31/05
Archived on: 03/31/05 CEST

---

2421 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]