Re: Disk/Partition level encryption.
From: David Wagner (daw_at_taverner.cs.berkeley.edu)
Date: 03/31/05
- Next message: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: Hash compression."
- Previous message: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: Disk/Partition level encryption."
- In reply to: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: Disk/Partition level encryption."
- Next in thread: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: Disk/Partition level encryption."
- Reply: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: Disk/Partition level encryption."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:42:33 +0000 (UTC)
Kristian Gjøsteen wrote:
>The downside is that the client must still have a lot of private storage.
Yes. I would assume you might store it in RAM (ideally, non-volatile
RAM, if you've got it), and occasionally checkpoint it out to disk (in
encrypted form, of course). There are issues of how to be resilient in
the presence of unexpected crashes that any real implementation would
have to address, though.
- Next message: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: Hash compression."
- Previous message: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: Disk/Partition level encryption."
- In reply to: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: Disk/Partition level encryption."
- Next in thread: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: Disk/Partition level encryption."
- Reply: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: Disk/Partition level encryption."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|