Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring
From: Gib Bogle (bogle_at_ihug.too.much.spam.co.nz)
Date: 03/31/05
- Next message: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: Disk/Partition level encryption."
- Previous message: Erwann ABALEA: "Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm"
- In reply to: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring"
- Next in thread: Randy Howard: "Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:39:31 +1200
Gregory G Rose wrote:
> In article <d2f6p5$vdv$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>,
> Gib Bogle <bogle@ihug.too.much.spam.co.nz> wrote:
>
>>jstevh@msn.com wrote:
>>
>>>Possibly that's a good place to start: Did I present a theorem in my
>>>opening post, or not?
>
>
> IMHO, no.
>
>
>>Is that a rhetorical question?
>
>
> Dunno. Is *this* a rhetorical question?
Yes ;-)
- Next message: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: Disk/Partition level encryption."
- Previous message: Erwann ABALEA: "Re: A very fast Fermat factoring algorithm"
- In reply to: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring"
- Next in thread: Randy Howard: "Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]