Re: 1wayfx challenge
From: Craig Feinstein (cafeinst_at_msn.com)
Date: 03/30/05
- Next message: C. Bond: "Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring"
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: Disk/Partition level encryption."
- In reply to: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: 1wayfx challenge"
- Next in thread: Craig Feinstein: "Re: 1wayfx challenge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 30 Mar 2005 09:46:35 -0800
Pubkeybreaker wrote:
> The problem as posed is total gibberish. They say:
>
> given F (....) [a function of 5 variables) (capital F; it is
> important)
> and an integer a
>
> solve f5(n) = a (lower case f with the digit 5 added]
>
> But the problem never states what F is, what f5 is or what n
is.
> Is n an integer?
> an integer vector? etc. etc.
>
> It is nonsense.
It's not gibberish because when you click on 'F={f1,f2,f3,f4,f5}' you
get its definition.
Craig
- Next message: C. Bond: "Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring"
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: Disk/Partition level encryption."
- In reply to: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: 1wayfx challenge"
- Next in thread: Craig Feinstein: "Re: 1wayfx challenge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]