Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring
From: David C. Ullrich (ullrich_at_math.okstate.edu)
Date: 03/30/05
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results"
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Critiquing surrogate factoring"
- Next in thread: C. Bond: "Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 05:42:25 -0600
On 29 Mar 2005 17:18:18 -0800, jstevh@msn.com wrote:
>[...]you can just program it and see if
>it factors, but I'll admit I've so far not had the nerve to test it,
>preferring to think about it.
>
>[...]
>
>This thread is for critiquing surrogate factoring.
This is a _truly_ bizarre notion of "critiguing" - you _know_
a simple test that you haven't bothered to try because you're
afraid of the results.
Weird.
>James Harris
************************
David C. Ullrich
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results"
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: Dieter Schmidt Blowfish Paper Results"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Critiquing surrogate factoring"
- Next in thread: C. Bond: "Re: Critiquing surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
