xml-security vs. native security
From: securenix (sequru_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/28/05
- Next message: David Eather: "Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ"
- Previous message: Joe Peschel: "Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ"
- Next in thread: Bruce Stephens: "Re: xml-security vs. native security"
- Reply: Bruce Stephens: "Re: xml-security vs. native security"
- Reply: Privacy Nut: "Re: xml-security vs. native security"
- Reply: Anne & Lynn Wheeler: "Re: xml-security vs. native security"
- Reply: Paul Rubin: "Re: xml-security vs. native security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:56:12 +0200
Hi,
I am involving in the development of an application framework focusing
on web services. Messages excnahged among framework principals are SOAP
messages.
For security issues like encrypting, signing, etc. I am planing to use
native byte[]-oriented cryptographic techniques. But I see around
xml-security solutions (e.g. WS-Security, etc.). I wonder what
advantages the xml-security bring us over native-security solutions? Do
native-solutions cause any bottleneck for web services?
Thanks
- Next message: David Eather: "Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ"
- Previous message: Joe Peschel: "Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ"
- Next in thread: Bruce Stephens: "Re: xml-security vs. native security"
- Reply: Bruce Stephens: "Re: xml-security vs. native security"
- Reply: Privacy Nut: "Re: xml-security vs. native security"
- Reply: Anne & Lynn Wheeler: "Re: xml-security vs. native security"
- Reply: Paul Rubin: "Re: xml-security vs. native security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]