Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder
From: John Smith (JSmith_at_mail.net)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: Steve O'Hara-Smith: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: 3DES on a network card: Intel Pro/100S"
- In reply to: Lynn Kurtz: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Next in thread: Bruce Stephens: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Reply: Bruce Stephens: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:02:16 GMT
Lynn Kurtz wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:11:18 GMT, John Smith <JSmith@mail.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Jumbie wrote:
>>
>>>Factor this:
>>>
>>>8473865710237493723946198263649821976398469181345623
>>>
>>>
>>
>>2360209087377863 * 23196547792409844187
>
>
> I don't think so, since the least significant digit of the product is
> wrong.
>
> --Lynn
The above (erroneous) result is the output of the factoring program
(factor.c) included in the GiantInt big integer arithmetic package
available as a free download from Perfectly Scientific, Inc.
http://www.perfsci.com/freegoods.htm
- Next message: Steve O'Hara-Smith: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: 3DES on a network card: Intel Pro/100S"
- In reply to: Lynn Kurtz: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Next in thread: Bruce Stephens: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Reply: Bruce Stephens: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
