Re: Encrypted files on computer as indication for guilt - where?
unruh-spam_at_physics.ubc.ca
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: karllarc: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Previous message: gerard46: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- In reply to: Juuso Hukkanen: "Re: Encrypted files on computer as indication for guilt - where?"
- Next in thread: Juuso Hukkanen: "Re: Encrypted files on computer as indication for guilt - where?"
- Reply: Juuso Hukkanen: "Re: Encrypted files on computer as indication for guilt - where?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 22 Mar 2005 00:45:51 GMT
Juuso Hukkanen <juuso929@tele3d.net> writes:
><OT>
> I am preparing to launch (on 2005/06/15) an open source project for
> building a C based programming language and after that I need LOTS of
> helping hands and minds. Language will include C (except the typical
> overflow functions) and most of the modern stuff missing from C -
> including encryption. If you are interested in being reminded/
Why in the world would you include encryption as a part of C itself? It
sounds to me like an add on library does this just as well as trying to
make it part of the language. That does not seem to me where it belongs.
- Next message: karllarc: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- Previous message: gerard46: "Re: Surrogate factoring ideas to ponder"
- In reply to: Juuso Hukkanen: "Re: Encrypted files on computer as indication for guilt - where?"
- Next in thread: Juuso Hukkanen: "Re: Encrypted files on computer as indication for guilt - where?"
- Reply: Juuso Hukkanen: "Re: Encrypted files on computer as indication for guilt - where?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
