Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?
From: Gregory G Rose (ggr_at_qualcomm.com)
Date: 03/08/05
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Previous message: Mike Oliver: "Re: SF: Simpler derivation"
- In reply to: infobahn: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Next in thread: infobahn: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Reply: infobahn: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 8 Mar 2005 09:56:40 -0800
In article <422D1C13.2277D6B@btinternet.com>,
infobahn <infobahn@btinternet.com> wrote:
>Also note that
>surnames are generally not considered private data.
Good thing, too, since some people don't have
them.
Greg.
-- Greg Rose 232B EC8F 44C6 C853 D68F E107 E6BF CD2F 1081 A37C Qualcomm Australia: http://www.qualcomm.com.au
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Previous message: Mike Oliver: "Re: SF: Simpler derivation"
- In reply to: infobahn: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Next in thread: infobahn: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Reply: infobahn: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
