Re: Checking my logic, surrogate factoring
From: C. Bond (cbond_at_ix.netcom.com)
Date: 03/05/05
- Next message: Tim Peters: "Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring"
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Checking my logic, surrogate factoring"
- Next in thread: Richard Henry: "Re: Checking my logic, surrogate factoring"
- Reply: Richard Henry: "Re: Checking my logic, surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 01:14:11 GMT
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
> I have one thread started with the correct perfect algorithm for
> surrogate factoring, and I will continue to reply in it and monitor it
> closely.
>
> However I still want to start another thread to talk out the solution,
> because I feel like it.
Letting your feelings dominate your behavior again, eh?
[snip]
> If some sci.crypt posters have been honest then they now have all they
> need to know to factor the RSA Challenge numbers, and I'm not asking
> for a dime of the RSA money.
>
> I don't need it.
You do, however, need credibility -- and factoring the RSA Challenge
numbers would certainly go a long way toward establishing it. Why don't
*you* do the factoring?
> What I need is out of this crazy limbo world which is why I even have
> to bother posting on Usenet.
You don't "have to bother posting on Usenet". That's entirely your choice.
> What I do want is to get out of this stupid hole of being labeled just
> some Usenet crank.
Then factor the RSA Challenge numbers and present your results to the
world.
> And make no mistake, as the math here is perfect, silence in the hope
> of personal profit on your part may lead to the opposite.
Make no mistake, failing to respond to the challenges posed demolishes your
credibility.
[snip]
-- There are two things you must never attempt to prove: the unprovable -- and the obvious. -- Democracy: The triumph of popularity over principle. -- http://www.crbond.com
- Next message: Tim Peters: "Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring"
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Checking my logic, surrogate factoring"
- Next in thread: Richard Henry: "Re: Checking my logic, surrogate factoring"
- Reply: Richard Henry: "Re: Checking my logic, surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|