Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring
From: Nathan (ntspam2_at_netscape.net)
Date: 03/05/05
- Next message: Tim Peters: "Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring"
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Checking my logic, surrogate factoring"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring"
- Reply: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 4 Mar 2005 15:20:50 -0800
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
> fiziwig wrote:
> > Could you take a reasonably small number, say 8 or 10
> > digits, and DEMONSTRATE, step by step how your method would be
> > applied to factoring that number. Can I see how you use it to
> > factor an easy number like 50,985,511 for example?
> Why? It'd make as much sense to factor an easy number like 15.
>
> I'm more of a theoretical guy. I want to know why.
So give a clear explanation of "how".
> So I give the mathematical basis for various ideas, and if you're
> interested enough, you can play with it and test it out.
The "basis" you've given so far isn't enough to really figure out
what it is you mean.
> I don't like specific factorization requests though I have tried some
> at times, as they don't serve a purpose.
Okay, so you pick the number. Just show us, in *complete* detail.
> If I factor the number, people will just put up bigger numbers, and
> if I could factor RSA Challenge numbers I wouldn't be talking about
> it on Usenet, but posters would keep putting up numbers until that
> point and beyond, as that's how Usenet is.
I think you misunderstood fiziwig. I think he's just asking for a
demonstration. That's something I would like to see, too.
You get a lot of hostile, rhetorical questions, and you deserve that.
But I read this as a genuine request.
Do you really think you've explained "surrogate factoring" in enough
detail for someone else to implement it? I don't think you have.
- Next message: Tim Peters: "Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring"
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Checking my logic, surrogate factoring"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring"
- Reply: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|