Re: Reverse engineering surrogate factoring
From: C. Bond (cbond_at_ix.netcom.com)
Date: 03/03/05
- Next message: Felix Rawlings: "Re: Reverse engineering surrogate factoring"
- Previous message: Jan Panteltje: "Re: X-No-archive considered harmful"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Reverse engineering surrogate factoring"
- Next in thread: Felix Rawlings: "Re: Reverse engineering surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 16:00:59 GMT
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
> There actually is a direct way to research surrogate factoring and
> answer questions quickly, which is basically reverse engineering.
Note that you do not answer any significant questions in your post.
[snip]...
> If 3. then surrogate factoring provides the first known perfect random
> number generator.
You still have no idea what a *perfect random number generator* is. Add
that lapse to the growing list of things you make stupid comments about.
> Those are the only possibilities,
Item 3. was not a possibility. It should have read, 3. I am an ineducable
moron.
-- There are two things you must never attempt to prove: the unprovable -- and the obvious. -- Democracy: The triumph of popularity over principle. -- http://www.crbond.com
- Next message: Felix Rawlings: "Re: Reverse engineering surrogate factoring"
- Previous message: Jan Panteltje: "Re: X-No-archive considered harmful"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Reverse engineering surrogate factoring"
- Next in thread: Felix Rawlings: "Re: Reverse engineering surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]