OT: Greenhouse gases (was Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found ...)
From: Bruce Stephens (bruce+usenet_at_cenderis.demon.co.uk)
Date: 02/28/05
- Next message: Brian Inglis: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Previous message: Jan Panteltje: "Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits"
- In reply to: Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho: "Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:07:37 +0000
Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho <decio@decpp.removethis.net> writes:
[...]
> I don't contribute to the greenhouse effect -- my country runs
> mostly on hydroelectric power.
The former doesn't necessarily follow from the latter,
<http://www.newscientist.com/channel/earth/mg18524884.100>:
This is because large amounts of carbon tied up in trees and other
plants are released when the reservoir is initially flooded and
the plants rot. Then after this first pulse of decay, plant matter
settling on the reservoir's bottom decomposes without oxygen,
resulting in a build-up of dissolved methane. This is released
into the atmosphere when water passes through the dam's turbines.
[...]
In effect man-made reservoirs convert carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere into methane. This is significant because methane's
effect on global warming is 21 times stronger than carbon
dioxide's.
> Now, if only you people over there quit being afraid of the
> `nucular' boogeyman...
I'm not sure how that rates nowadays. I know once upon a time
electricity was going to be too cheap to meter. I wouldn't be at all
surprised to find that the emissions used to build, maintain, and
decommission nuclear power stations made it less attractive than
promoters claim. (I note recently that in the UK new energy efficient
domestic gas boilers have been criticised: it turns out that they're
less reliable than older ones, and it turns out that the energy
savings are outweighed by the energy used by extra visits by
repairmen.)
Not that this has anything to do with cryptography. My guess is that
looking for Mersenne primes is a pretty harmless activity in the
overall scheme of things.
- Next message: Brian Inglis: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Previous message: Jan Panteltje: "Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits"
- In reply to: Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho: "Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|