Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard
From: Randy Howard (randyhoward_at_FOOverizonBAR.net)
Date: 02/28/05
- Next message: Kevin Drapel: "Re: DES decrpytion tools"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- In reply to: Tom Linden: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Next in thread: Tom Linden: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Reply: Tom Linden: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:48:24 GMT
In article <opsmv0w2dbzgicya@hyrrokkin>, tom@kednos.com says...
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:43:34 GMT, Randy Howard
> <randyhoward@FOOverizonBAR.net> wrote:
> >> I have always regarded range/bounds checking and exception handling as
> >> necessary and integral to well designed code.
> >
> > True, but implementing it specifically seems easier to do efficiently
> > than implementing a generic bounds checker for J. Random Program.
>
> It is part of PL/I.
Which is very likely one of the reasons that C is so widely used for
low-level programming today and PL/I is not.
You can't have your cake and eat it too, at least not so far.
-- Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR) "Making it hard to do stupid things often makes it hard to do smart ones too." -- Andrew Koenig
- Next message: Kevin Drapel: "Re: DES decrpytion tools"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- In reply to: Tom Linden: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Next in thread: Tom Linden: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Reply: Tom Linden: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]