Re: SF: Back to theory
From: Proginoskes (proginoskes_at_email.msn.com)
Date: 02/28/05
- Next message: Dave Rusin: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Previous message: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- In reply to: Nora Baron: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: Randy Howard: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 27 Feb 2005 15:17:32 -0800
Nora Baron (?) wrote:
> As in many other instances he has his own nonstandard definition
> of 'liar'. A 'liar' is someone who disagrees with James Harris.
Could the Catholic Church have called Galileo a liar when he said the
Earth goes around the Sun, and not the other way around? According to
James Harris, yes.
--- Christopher Heckman
- Next message: Dave Rusin: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Previous message: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- In reply to: Nora Baron: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: Randy Howard: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|