Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard
From: Randy Howard (randyhoward_at_FOOverizonBAR.net)
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: Willem: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Previous message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- In reply to: Trevor L. Jackson, III: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Next in thread: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Reply: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:51:33 GMT
In article <XLudnYz7ocXEtb_fRVn-2Q@comcast.com>, tlj3@comcast.net
says...
> Strange, I assumed it was a prime. Think such a key manifest constant
> might deserve an explanatry comment? How about the whole routine? Why
> should we be guessing?
>
> The bit about "comments omitted in the interest of publishing economy"
> does not work for code distributed to students and intended as model
> code. Fail the instructor.
Actually the number was included in the original assignment, and
it was not prime. It was also not a power of 2, but evenly divisible
by 5.
-- Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR) "Making it hard to do stupid things often makes it hard to do smart ones too." -- Andrew Koenig
- Next message: Willem: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Previous message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- In reply to: Trevor L. Jackson, III: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Next in thread: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Reply: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]