Re: My solution to chess grandmaster problem in zero knowledge proofs of identity.
From: Vladimir Shabanov (virl_at_mail.ru)
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Previous message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Maybe in reply to: Vladimir Shabanov: "My solution to chess grandmaster problem in zero knowledge proofs of identity."
- Next in thread: Vladimir Shabanov: "Re: My solution to chess grandmaster problem in zero knowledge proofs of identity."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 27 Feb 2005 11:26:57 -0800
Maybe I don't understanded grandmaster problem.
My protocol is intended to be against "mafia fraud" attacks.
> Step 2 is useless from the standpoint of authentication
No, I think it doesn't.
> Bob does not "restore" the unsigned message--he verifies
> that the signature could only have been
> computed by someone holding Alice's private key(s).
Yes, of course.
> When he decrypts Q using his private key, of course
> it's going to be what he sent since it was encrypted
> with his own public key.
> In other words, anyone could have encrypted it.
But Bob, thanks to this protocol, in result gets knowledge of two
things:
1) That other side knows private key that corresponds to public key
this side sended to Bob.
2) That other side is not mafiosi (who just redirects Alice's answers).
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Previous message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Maybe in reply to: Vladimir Shabanov: "My solution to chess grandmaster problem in zero knowledge proofs of identity."
- Next in thread: Vladimir Shabanov: "Re: My solution to chess grandmaster problem in zero knowledge proofs of identity."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|