Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms.
From: Trevor L. Jackson, III (tlj3_at_comcast.net)
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: Trevor L. Jackson, III: "Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms."
- Previous message: Haldir: "Re: Question about hashing implementation for authentication"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms."
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:33:28 -0500
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
> Trevor L. Jackson, III wrote:
>>Be our guest. Just do your work quietly. Don't announce any more
>>results until you can actually deliver on the results you have
>
> already
>
>>announced.
>>
>
>
> And there your irrationality betrays itself.
It's not irrationality, it's recreation. Sometimes called feeding the
trolls. Currently I am unable to make any useful contributions to this
forum, so I'm amusing myself at your expense.
>
> Usenet is a public medium where freedom of speech is supposedly prized.
Correct. Want a lollipop? It is also a forum where stupidity and
foolishness get short shrift. Do you see apttern here? If not look harder.
>
> Ordering other posters to follow your rules and post as you see fit is
> against the very heart of the medium.
I didn't order you to do anything. I invited you to act sensibly. If
you decline it that's your problem.
>
> Yet routinely I face posters who do just that, betraying your own
> ability to be contradictory.
Hmmm. you recognize the fact that many people reactict negatively to
your silliness, yet you persist. That is priceless. Please don;t
change your behavior as that might endanger your ability to entertain us.
OTOH, you could take youself and your announcements to someplace where
they might be appreciated. Boston Common for example.
>
> You cannot control Usenet. It is futile to attempt to control Usenet
> posters.
Yes, but like fly fishing, getting idiots to rise to the bait is art,
and one I find entertaining and relaxing.
Who the *** are you to deny me my enjoyment?
>
> But you try anyway. That says something about your mental processes.
Yes, engaging you at any level is clearly an indication that I am
mentally unsound. I'm certain that I can live with it. I expect it
will be quite amusing to determine whether you can live with it.
>
> Quantum mechanics, no matter what your mind tells you, is not magic.
My mind tells me nothing, which is dramatically more than you have told
anyone.
>
> I know magic.
Ah. Good. I knew the truth would come out sooner or later. Please
tell us: How is that you "know magic"?
> And quantum mechanics is not it.
The above questions is critically important to the future of this topic
because clearly you know nothing about quantum mechanics. So your claim
that it is not related to magic is an empty statement unless you can
provide chapter and verse on your knowledge of magic.
/tj3
- Next message: Trevor L. Jackson, III: "Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms."
- Previous message: Haldir: "Re: Question about hashing implementation for authentication"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms."
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]