Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated

From: ošin (ošin_at_ragnarok.com)
Date: 02/26/05 

Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:57:17 -0800

>> I'm trying to find a number the current algorithm does NOT factor.
>
> Well, found it. Sigh. I'll tell you the trouble with ideas, there's
> little worse than coming up with something new.

Do your work, then when (if) you are done, tell us about it. In the while...
*** off.

> So I have this idea that I think is worth checking into, which is to
> use some other number to factor a target, and I can get some
> tantalizing results but I can't nail it all down, so I have to go into
> long-term research mode.

I wish that "long-term research mode" meant quiet mode.

> I made a post about how surrogate factoring is a concept--you use one
> number to factor another--but it won't stop posters from telling you it
> can't work, even though it's a concept, so how can you say it can't
> work.

Nobody said that the concept of factoring one number with anpother number
cannot work. People have only been saying that you are full of ***, and
your technique is trash.

> You get called a crackpot.

If the shoe fits......

> Years pass, maybe even decades, and then you're hailed as brilliant,
> often after you're dead.

So perhaps you could speed up the process by killing yourself today? Please?