Re: Chance of getting a sensible result with a bad key
dominicsmith501_at_hotmail.com
Date: 02/26/05
- Next message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated"
- Previous message: dominicsmith501_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Chance of getting a sensible result with a bad key"
- In reply to: dominicsmith501_at_hotmail.com: "Chance of getting a sensible result with a bad key"
- Next in thread: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Chance of getting a sensible result with a bad key"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 25 Feb 2005 15:51:38 -0800
16 BYTE messages, not 16 bit messages, obviously!
- Next message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated"
- Previous message: dominicsmith501_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Chance of getting a sensible result with a bad key"
- In reply to: dominicsmith501_at_hotmail.com: "Chance of getting a sensible result with a bad key"
- Next in thread: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Chance of getting a sensible result with a bad key"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
