Re: SF: Back to theory
From: C. Bond (cbond_at_ix.netcom.com)
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: Bryan Olson: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Previous message: Tim Peters: "Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:22:58 GMT
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
> I see a lot of negative postings about my ideas, and surrogate
> factoring is getting a lot of bashing, but hey, it's just an idea.
Oh? What happened to "I have solved the factoring problem"?
> It may not be practical--ever. But it's still just an idea, and I can
> discuss it as just an idea, having long ago backed away from calling it
> a solution to the factoring problem.
You still haven't apologized to the critics who correctly identified errors
and who you then called liars.
> Now some posters seem to be obsessed with political posting meant to
> drive others away from my idea. I say, look at what they're doing as
> just that--political postings.
Exactly what political agenda are they promoting? Are they Republicans or
Democrats? Maybe Libertarians?
> Now to the theory.
[snip umpteenth flawed exposition wherein James continues to leap
triumphantly to false conclusions]
-- There are two things you must never attempt to prove: the unprovable -- and the obvious. -- Democracy: The triumph of popularity over principle. -- http://www.crbond.com
- Next message: Bryan Olson: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Previous message: Tim Peters: "Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
