Re: SF: Back to theory

From: Randy Howard (randyhoward_at_FOOverizonBAR.net)
Date: 02/25/05


Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:34:46 GMT

In article <1109301025.288421.281820@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
jstevh@msn.com says...
> I see a lot of negative postings about my ideas, and surrogate
> factoring is getting a lot of bashing, but hey, it's just an idea.

[snip]

I thought you were taking a break for a while. Don't tease me like
that, it's not nice.

-- 
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"Making it hard to do stupid things often makes it hard
 to do smart ones too." -- Andrew Koenig


Relevant Pages

  • Re: SF: Back to theory
    ... > I see a lot of negative postings about my ideas, and surrogate ... > factoring is getting a lot of bashing, but hey, it's just an idea. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory
    ... > I see a lot of negative postings about my ideas, and surrogate ... > factoring is getting a lot of bashing, but hey, it's just an idea. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory
    ... > I see a lot of negative postings about my ideas, and surrogate ... > factoring is getting a lot of bashing, but hey, it's just an idea. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory
    ... > I see a lot of negative postings about my ideas, ... > factoring is getting a lot of bashing, but hey, it's just an idea. ... > Basically with the latest surrogate factoring I've been analyzing the ... > algorithms, which I'll get to later, require that both j and T be ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory
    ... > I see a lot of negative postings about my ideas, ... > factoring is getting a lot of bashing, but hey, it's just an idea. ... > Basically with the latest surrogate factoring I've been analyzing the ... > algorithms, which I'll get to later, require that both j and T be ...
    (sci.crypt)