Re: SF: Back to theory
From: ošin (ošin_at_ragnarok.com)
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: ošin: "Re: Back to theory"
- Previous message: ChumlyDoright: "Re: Back to theory"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: ChumlyDoright: "Re: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:41:08 -0800
> I think it indicates there are blocking primes.
So yesterday, you introduced "cracking primes", and today you introduce
"blocking primes". Reminds me of "properly units"... means NOTHING!
- Next message: ošin: "Re: Back to theory"
- Previous message: ChumlyDoright: "Re: Back to theory"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: ChumlyDoright: "Re: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
