Re: Complex solutions, current state of the art

jstevh_at_msn.com
Date: 02/25/05 

Date: 24 Feb 2005 19:17:24 -0800

KeithK wrote:
> "Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho" <decio@decpp.removethis.net> wrote in
message
> news:386kdhF5janolU1@individual.net...
> > KeithK wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > I haven't seen James respond to the following, which I quote from
'flip'
> > > Feb
> > > 18 RE: in the thread Factoring, sf,and reasonable requests. But
note
> > > James' sudden interest in complex numbers in this thread.
> > >
> > > <quote>
> > > "These equations were previously published in the 1930's by Ivan
Melch,
> in
> > > a
> > > German book titled "Functions Theory" by Fischkopf Press. Melch
has
> them
> > > as only a side note on page 137 as part of his derivation of the
famous
> > > Gebratener Speck theory. Melch uses Z, a complex quantity instead
of the
> > > oversimplified real number A. The equations were also shown to be
> > > irrelevant for either surrogate factoring, or random number
generation.
> > >
> > > Claims by "James Harris" that he "invented them" are unfounded.
> > > Unfortunately, he made several mistakes as he copied the
equations out
> of
> > > the book, such as overlooking the complex to real number, which
further
> > > makes them useless."
> > > <unquote>
> >
> > I have reason to believe this was pulled out of flip's ass. Try to
search
> > Amazon.com or Google for Ivan Melch.
> >
> > I will publicly retreat this accusation if presented with a scan of
this
> > book supporting flip's claim.
> >
> > It's unbelievable how low people would sink to attack James Harris.
It's
> > easy enough to attack his mathematics, why bother with personal
attacks?
> >
> I agree, and I do not like the posts that simply attack him with all
those
> smart aleck comments. I was only noting that he didn't respond to or
refute
> flip's quote, which was a show stopper if true. And if the quote did
emerge
> from the orifice you suspect, my apologies to James and I should have
known
> better, coming from flip..
>
> I occasionally respond to his math and in general am sympathetic to
James,
> an amateur math enthusiast whom I regard as truly excited about his
math
> ventures, albeit incapable of properly framing a proof or of abiding
(or
> perhaps understanding) a mathematical refutation when it shows errors
in his
> math. He usually ignores the flippant remarks, but visciously
attacks the
> three or four skilled mathematicians who try conscientiously to help
him
> with the math.
>
> KeithK

Propaganda. I mean, come on, it's way past obvious that some of you
are negative political campaigners running your own negative ads as
posts.

For instance, why claim I can't frame a proof?

I have number theory research that is absolutely correct, which even
sci.math'ers can't claim doesn't work, so they bash it as being not
unique, which is my prime counting research.

You people are just running a political smear campaign, and it just
doesn't end.

Politics may die down a bit in the United States with an election
finally gets done, but here on math newsgroups the campaigning never
dies down.

You people never quit bashing.

I don't either. But having watched my share of political campaigns
here in the US I know that the guy who tries to play it nice is the guy
who loses at the start.

Look at Kerry, look at Gore, look at Dole, look at Dukakis.

Look at the losers here in the states, and consider that if you can't
bash as well as the people bashing you, then it's over.

I bash well.

James Harris

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Complex solutions, current state of the art
    ... >> It's unbelievable how low people would sink to attack James Harris. ... > better, coming from flip.. ... > I occasionally respond to his math and in general am sympathetic to ... are negative political campaigners running your own negative ads as ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Complex solutions, current state of the art
    ... KeithK wrote: ... >> It's unbelievable how low people would sink to attack James Harris. ... > better, coming from flip.. ... > I occasionally respond to his math and in general am sympathetic to ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Complex solutions, current state of the art
    ... KeithK wrote: ... >> It's unbelievable how low people would sink to attack James Harris. ... > better, coming from flip.. ... > I occasionally respond to his math and in general am sympathetic to ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Factorizaton idea, revisited
    ... Usenet is a place where people who do NOT have novel ideas ... > upset if anyone else who can produce real research dares to intrude on ... > newsgroup as if it's their own backyard and they will attack, attack, ... Just because you want to discuss math doesn't entitle you to post every ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: What are you reading?
    ... My brother from a different mother! ... Just flip the math and verbal. ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
Loading