Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns
From: Charlie Gibbs (cgibbs_at_kltpzyxm.invalid)
Date: 02/22/05
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: hash function"
- Previous message: Charlie Gibbs: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Maybe in reply to: Brian Inglis: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: rpl: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Reply: rpl: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 22 Feb 05 10:30:49 -0800
In article <B62dnUEaLb3PuIbfRVn-hA@rcn.net>, jmfbahciv@aol.com
(jmfbahciv) writes:
> All kinds of stuff can be learned by playing with a 1620.
Plus, it isn't a 32-bit system. :-)
-- /~\ cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs) \ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way. X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855. / \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: hash function"
- Previous message: Charlie Gibbs: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Maybe in reply to: Brian Inglis: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: rpl: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Reply: rpl: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
