Re: SF: Doesn't work?
mensanator_at_aol.compost
Date: 02/22/05
- Next message: Navin Kumar: "Re: really basic hash question"
- Previous message: vedaal: "Re: really basic hash question"
- In reply to: Gianna Stefani: "Re: SF: Doesn't work?"
- Next in thread: Gianna Stefani: "Re: SF: Doesn't work?"
- Reply: Gianna Stefani: "Re: SF: Doesn't work?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 22 Feb 2005 10:20:22 -0800
Gianna Stefani wrote:
> jstevh@msn.com wrote:
> > Gianna Stefani wrote:
> >
> >
> > Well, first off, if she was honest, she would have admitted not
being
> > able to make much of the new information.
>
> That was her initial reaction, after one glance. But you might have
> phrased it '... make much use of the information' as it was only
'new'
> insofar as she had not looked at that page of equations before.
>
> >
> > There ARE actually some fairly intelligent people who have a lot of
> > expertise in the area who are on Usenet, and I can tell you--and
you
> > should have noticed already--that they can't quite get a handle on
it
> > yet, so your daughter didn't have much of a chance.
> >
>
> That was very impolite. You have no idea of her capabilities or lack
> thereof. She merely required a little time to get into it, whereas I
> would have required an education or a brain transplant.
>
> I did indeed notice how the appropriate people reacted here ... many
> tried to help.
>
> > I doubt she was honest to you, and instead played expert.
> >
>
> That is actually very funny ... I sometimes wish she was that
arrogant.
> She does not need to impress me ... she already has my attention.
>
>
> > Lesson: Don't go to your kid, as she's going to worry more about
your
> > reaction than being objective.
> >
>
> Don't presume to type 'Lesson:' to me.
>
> As for the content of your 'lesson', she is not that subservient -
she
> might worry about my reaction if she had just killed someone ... but
not
> about something as trivial as a page of equations.
> Again, she has no need to impress me.
Speaking of that, James mentioned that his father (whom I don't
recall ever before being mentioned) told him his worry about
terrorists breaking encryption was just paranoia.
So do you think this is just projection on James' part, that all
this bullshit is just to impress his father? Is his father just
an uneducated share-cropper easily snowed by James' mumbo-jumbo,
an educated professional whose standards James is trying desperately
to live up to or something in between?
Now I think his desire for fame, fortune and chicks is just a
smokescreen.
>
>
> >
> > I liked your post.
> >
>
> Then I trust you will like this one too.
>
> --
> Gianna Stefani
- Next message: Navin Kumar: "Re: really basic hash question"
- Previous message: vedaal: "Re: really basic hash question"
- In reply to: Gianna Stefani: "Re: SF: Doesn't work?"
- Next in thread: Gianna Stefani: "Re: SF: Doesn't work?"
- Reply: Gianna Stefani: "Re: SF: Doesn't work?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|