Re: SF: Doesn't work?
From: Randy Howard (randyhoward_at_FOOverizonBAR.net)
Date: 02/22/05
- Next message: Trevor L. Jackson, III: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Previous message: Trevor L. Jackson, III: "Re: Adversarial Testing, was Re: Thou shalt have no"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "SF: Doesn't work?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 04:11:36 GMT
In article <1108941454.935598.112870@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
jstevh@msn.com says...
> Well I don't know but I did a long calculation with the algorithm that
> I was certain had to be the solution, and it failed to factor.
*gasp* Does that mean we won't all burn in hell for not believing
you, now that you yourself admit it doesn't work in all, or even most
cases?
> I'm getting tired of this myself, especially since I've so stupidly
> built it up for myself in terms of the worry of finding an easy
> factoring method.
Imagine how relieved the NSA must feel to know you are going to give
them a rest now.
-- Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR) "Making it hard to do stupid things often makes it hard to do smart ones too." -- Andrew Koenig
- Next message: Trevor L. Jackson, III: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Previous message: Trevor L. Jackson, III: "Re: Adversarial Testing, was Re: Thou shalt have no"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "SF: Doesn't work?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
