Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard

From: Tom Linden (tom_at_kednos.com)
Date: 02/20/05


Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 06:07:52 -0800

On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:17:31 -0800, Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com>
wrote:

> Brian Inglis wrote:
>> This is a problem because most home PC users neither know or care if
>> someone else has taken over their PC for spamming or DDoS as long as
>> they can listen to their CDs or MP3s, view their DVDs or photos, and
>> print those and whatever they're interested in from the internet. That
>> causes problems for businesses, using similarly vulnerable
>> systems, who invest too little in maintaining current and effective
>> blocking, prevention, and detection mechanisms.
>
> Both at home and at the office, I run a typical "small business"
> setup with a Linux-based edge router, a Linux file and application
> server and a gagle of Windows desktops around them. And in both
> places, I find a server compromised every few months, despite
> a moderately aggressive amount of firewalling. I usually find
> them when I read the periodic reports from the programs that
> scan the system logs. Cleaning up is ugly, boring and timecon-
> suming and I tend to be defensive when my business partner asks
> why I have my head in the server all day again. He is somewhat
> sceptical when I explain what happens and how a 'bot sits
> and waits for a chatroom-server in Romania, Sweden or the Nether-
> lands to give it commands. Of course we can't have this kind of
> infection on the server that holds our critical business data.

Did you consider running VMS with WASD?
>
> My partner keeps asking if it is such a challenge for me, whom
> he is charitable enough to consider competent, how do most businesses
> handle this? My answer is that most of them are infected, but
> they don't pay enough attention to discover it.
>
> I'm beginning to work on a dynamic firewall ... an embedded
> system that has a list of legitimate services, and notes and
> totally blocks access from anyone who tries to connect to
> anything else, at least for a time interval that increases
> exponentially on repeated attempts. (The idea being that anyone
> who is knocking on a non-existent service is probably up to no
> good, and should not be allowed into the legitimate services
> either.) Yes, I know there are commercial products out there,
> but they contain too much code for me to feel entirely safe.
> By rolling my own, I can keep it to a few thousand lines,
> which makes me feel much safer.
>
> / Lars Poulsen

-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Install Silverlight?
    ... Most of our clients are small businesses who don't like spending money. ... MS does recommend restricting browsing from a server - I am dealing with it - note that MS only said 'recommend restricting'. ... Trusting AV software is foolish. ... The trend I see is less and less infection, especially at the user workstation level. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard
    ... Both at home and at the office, I run a typical "small business" ... server and a gagle of Windows desktops around them. ... infection on the server that holds our critical business data. ... and should not be allowed into the legitimate services ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: [Full-disclosure] windows future
    ... backup and recovery plan these days. ... Businesses will be less affected than ... Did you see the link I posted to the "Evolvable Malware" PPT? ... I have already decommissioned one server, ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • RE: [fw-wiz] Managed Firewall Service - Opinions
    ... > Company A installs 3rd party software and server for vacation rental business. ... > and insists MSSP ... Company C is introducing a vulnerability and risk ... For many businesses this is an acceptable level of risk. ...
    (Firewall-Wizards)
  • Re: Install Silverlight?
    ... Most of our clients are small businesses who don't like spending money. ... MS does recommend restricting browsing from a server - I am dealing with it - note that MS only said 'recommend restricting'. ... So you are suggesting we don't use AV software because it is foolish to do so? ... So if you feel I made a personal attack, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)