Re: SHA1 broken
From: Paul Rubin (//phr.cx_at_NOSPAM.invalid)
Date: 02/16/05
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: SHA1 broken"
- Previous message: blmblm_at_myrealbox.com: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: SHA1 broken"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: SHA1 broken"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: SHA1 broken"
- Reply: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: SHA1 broken"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 16 Feb 2005 09:12:56 -0800
"tomstdenis@gmail.com" <tomstdenis@gmail.com> writes:
> It means a given characteristic through the cipher cannot have a
> probability of occuring above a given threshold. Early today I quoted
> 2^-72 [iirc] for 4 rounds... that means any four round differential
> pattern would hold 2^-72 of the time.
OK, say I check for the pattern 2^20 times. Does that give me a 2^-52
chance of spotting the differential? Is that a distinguishing attack?
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: SHA1 broken"
- Previous message: blmblm_at_myrealbox.com: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: SHA1 broken"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: SHA1 broken"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: SHA1 broken"
- Reply: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: SHA1 broken"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|