Re: Surrogate factoring, room for error?
From: David C. Ullrich (ullrich_at_math.okstate.edu)
Date: 02/14/05
- Next message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: My brainstorming and crank label"
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Surrogate factoring, room for error?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 05:55:55 -0600
On 13 Feb 2005 15:05:36 -0800, jstevh@msn.com wrote:
>Well, considering the direct evidence that I may be wrong,
What??? You've said a few times that you might be wrong,
but just yesterday you announced that you'd posted a complete
proof, so the case was closed.
I'm so confused.
>it seems to
>me that the simplest explanation would be at the start:
>
>yx^2 + Ax - M^2 = 0
>
>and
>
>yz^2 + Az - j^2 = 0
>
>as that's an assertion of a truth.
>
>Essentially I'm saying that there exists these two quadratics related
>in that given way, but if in fact no rationals exist such that all
>conditions can be met for a given natural M and j then that statement
>is false.
>
>If it is true, then all else follows in the basic argument I've given.
>
>So then, can that initial start be false?
>
>
>James Harris
************************
David C. Ullrich
- Next message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: My brainstorming and crank label"
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Surrogate factoring, room for error?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
