Re: Public Key, Symbolic Calculation
From: Kiuhnm (kiuhnm03_at_yahoo.it.invalid)
Date: 02/08/05
- Next message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Previous message: David Eather: "Re: New way to factor? Yes!"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: Public Key, Symbolic Calculation"
- Next in thread: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Public Key, Symbolic Calculation"
- Reply: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Public Key, Symbolic Calculation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 16:13:11 GMT
David Wagner wrote:
> But even this is not precise enough. What field does the polynomial
> lie in, and how is it specified? If you say that the polynomial lies
> in C, we're back to trouble again, because you can't specify arbitrary
> elements of C in finite length. Perhaps you meant that the polynomial
> p has integral, or rational, coefficients? In that case the polynomial
> can be specified in finite length using any standard encoding.
The polynomial has "algebraic" coefficients, but I am afraid that if the
"algebric form" of the solution is known, the problem is simple.
Kiuhnm
- Next message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard"
- Previous message: David Eather: "Re: New way to factor? Yes!"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: Public Key, Symbolic Calculation"
- Next in thread: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Public Key, Symbolic Calculation"
- Reply: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Public Key, Symbolic Calculation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|