Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard

From: Peter Flass (Peter_Flass_at_Yahoo.com)
Date: 02/06/05


Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 22:36:18 GMT

Charlie Gibbs wrote:

> In article <PN-dnRk-d7vslpvfRVn-sA@rcn.net>, jmfbahciv@aol.com
> (jmfbahciv) writes:
>
>
>>In article <36kt4jF52qdprU2@individual.net>, blmblm@myrealbox.com
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article <tPqdnSEVrZG_epnfRVn-hQ@rcn.net>, <jmfbahciv@aol.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Another soul-stopper is when you find out that these kids don't
>>>>know that computers can't add.
>>>
>>>Please provide your definition of "can't add". Obviously having
>>>something in the instruction set that performs an operation that is
>>>described as "add the contents of these two registers, treating them
>>>as two's complement integers, and put the result in that register"
>>>doesn't count ....? (Not being argumentative, though it's tempting;
>>>instead wondering what it is I'm not getting here.)
>>
>>Humans add in decimal and thus assume computers do so, too. Some
>>computers did add in decimal but the last one I met could only
>>deal with cards and a TTY console.
>
>
> The IBM 1620 did everything - including memory addressing - in decimal.
> And it couldn't add (although a later version did add enough circuitry
> to do so). Addition was done by hardware-driven table lookup in low
> memory, which led to its nickname "CADET": Can't Add, Doesn't Even Try.
>

And I understand, tho I have no first-hand experience, that you could do
all kinds of neat stuff by overlaying the table.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard
    ... On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Charlie Gibbs wrote: ... > (jmfbahciv) writes: ... >> Humans add in decimal and thus assume computers do so, ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Exploiting limitations of Turing machines in Turing tests?
    ... Because humans are subject to the same limitations. ... Turing Machine, but none of them are close to physically realizable in this ... humans are even WORSE off on these topics than computers. ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Re: On draws
    ... *equally* strong humans. ... you are comparing computers with minor ... though computers play extremely good chess. ... not to draw (and as far as I know programmers have *not* ...
    (rec.games.chess.misc)
  • Re: Tom Bethell: Politically Incorrect Science
    ... > assumption of materialism. ... Matter is all there is. ... Humans exist, ... If that would be the case, computers will become just as ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Sabermetrics goes mainstream, part 2384
    ... What do businesses want to do - make the most money ... The mathematical formulas ... is the mindset that says that computers think better than humans. ...
    (rec.sport.baseball)