sci.crypt
By Thread

5039 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]

---

Starting: 01/31/05
Ending: 02/28/05

• TomsFastMath ... faster tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/28/05)
• DES decrpytion tools efenner (02/28/05)
  • Re: DES decrpytion tools Kevin Drapel (02/28/05)
  • Re: DES decrpytion tools MP (02/28/05)
• A5/1 not cracked? Frank Jansen (02/28/05)
• [SSL-Talk List FAQ] Secure Sockets Layer Discussion List FAQ v1.1.1 Shannon Appel (02/28/05)
• Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/28/05)
• Anti-phishing proposal -- am I missing something? Carlos Moreno (02/28/05)
• Neural Encryption timbrigham_at_hotmail.com (02/28/05)
• 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits superuser (02/27/05)
  • Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits David Wagner (02/28/05)
    • Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/28/05)
    • Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits superuser (02/28/05)
      • Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/28/05)
    • Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits Thomas Pornin (02/28/05)
      • Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/28/05)
      • Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found == 2^25,964,951-1 == The number has 7,816,230 digits Jan Panteltje (02/28/05)
      • OT: Greenhouse gases (was Re: 42nd Known Mersenne Prime Found ...) Bruce Stephens (02/28/05)
• Religious wars Trevor L. Jackson, III (02/27/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Virgil (02/27/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Ioannis (02/27/05)
    • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Andrew Swallow (02/27/05)
      • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Willem (02/27/05)
      • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Dave Rusin (02/28/05)
      • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Willem (02/28/05)
      • Re: A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? spinoza1111_at_yahoo.com (02/28/05)
    • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? gerard46 (02/27/05)
      • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Percival (02/27/05)
      • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? gerard46 (02/27/05)
      • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Dave Rusin (02/28/05)
      • Re: [A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Soundspider (02/28/05)
    • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Willem (02/27/05)
      • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? gerard46 (02/27/05)
      • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Bob Deblier (02/28/05)
      • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Jeremy Boden (02/28/05)
    • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Percival (02/27/05)
    • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Jim Spriggs (02/28/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Jacob Sheehy (02/27/05)
    • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Arthur J. O'Dwyer (02/27/05)
    • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? spinoza1111_at_yahoo.com (02/28/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? spinoza1111_at_yahoo.com (02/28/05)
    • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Bill Godfrey (02/28/05)
  • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Tim Smith (02/28/05)
    • Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done? Tim Smith (02/28/05)
• My solution to chess grandmaster problem in zero knowledge proofs of identity. Vladimir Shabanov (02/27/05)
  • Re: My solution to chess grandmaster problem in zero knowledge proofs of identity. Vladimir Shabanov (02/27/05)
  • Re: My solution to chess grandmaster problem in zero knowledge proofs of identity. Vladimir Shabanov (02/28/05)
    • Re: My solution to chess grandmaster problem in zero knowledge proofs of identity. Valery Pryamikov (02/28/05)
• Question about hashing implementation for authentication Garrett Kajmowicz (02/26/05)
  • Re: Question about hashing implementation for authentication Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/26/05)
    • Re: Question about hashing implementation for authentication Garrett Kajmowicz (02/26/05)
      • Re: Question about hashing implementation for authentication Haldir (02/27/05)
• Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. cesarbremer_at_raseac.com.br (02/26/05)
  • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. cesarbremer_at_raseac.com.br (02/26/05)
  • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. jstevh_at_msn.com (02/26/05)
    • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/26/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. jstevh_at_msn.com (02/26/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. jstevh_at_msn.com (02/26/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. Trevor L. Jackson, III (02/26/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. jstevh_at_msn.com (02/26/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. Beth (02/27/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. Bill Unruh (02/27/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. Trevor L. Jackson, III (02/27/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. Trevor L. Jackson, III (02/27/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. Douglas A. Gwyn (02/27/05)
    • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. Beth (02/26/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. yama (02/27/05)
    • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. Trevor L. Jackson, III (02/26/05)
    • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. Douglas A. Gwyn (02/27/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. jstevh_at_msn.com (02/27/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. Beth (02/27/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. jstevh_at_msn.com (02/27/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. Seth (02/27/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. Morten Dahl (02/27/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. jstevh_at_msn.com (02/28/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/28/05)
      • Re: Quantum computer using using artificial atoms. Douglas A. Gwyn (02/28/05)
• [ANN] RaBiGeTe and RaBiGeTe GUI Cristiano (02/26/05)
• Plausible deniability vs useability Joe C (02/26/05)
  • Re: Plausible deniability vs useability vedaal (02/27/05)
• Chance of getting a sensible result with a bad key dominicsmith501_at_hotmail.com (02/26/05)
  • Re: Chance of getting a sensible result with a bad key dominicsmith501_at_hotmail.com (02/26/05)
  • Re: Chance of getting a sensible result with a bad key dominicsmith501_at_hotmail.com (02/26/05)
  • Re: Chance of getting a sensible result with a bad key Gregory G Rose (02/26/05)
  • Re: Chance of getting a sensible result with a bad key Peter Pearson (02/26/05)
  • Re: Chance of getting a sensible result with a bad key Douglas A. Gwyn (02/26/05)
• a new algo to cryptanalyse navi_routes (02/25/05)
  • Re: a new algo to cryptanalyse Gianna Stefani (02/25/05)
  • Re: a new algo to cryptanalyse Peter Pearson (02/26/05)
  • thanks navi_routes (02/26/05)
• Multiple hashes of same password Simon Kissane (02/25/05)
  • Re: Multiple hashes of same password Jean-Luc Cooke (02/25/05)
• Can you break this code? BigDaddyD (02/25/05)
• SF: Back to theory jstevh_at_msn.com (02/25/05)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory jstevh_at_msn.com (02/25/05)
    • Re: SF: Back to theory ođin (02/25/05)
  • Re: Back to theory ChumlyDoright (02/25/05)
    • Re: Back to theory ođin (02/25/05)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory Nora Baron (02/25/05)
    • Re: SF: Back to theory Tim Peters (02/26/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory jstevh_at_msn.com (02/26/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory C. Bond (02/26/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory ođin (02/26/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory Tim Peters (02/26/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory Nora Baron (02/26/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory Tim Peters (02/27/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory Mike Kent (02/27/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory Tim Peters (02/27/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory Paul Murray (02/27/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory Nora Baron (02/27/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory Tim Peters (02/27/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory Nora Baron (02/27/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory jstevh_at_msn.com (02/27/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory Nora Baron (02/27/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory David C. Ullrich (02/28/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory David Kastrup (02/28/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory C. Bond (02/28/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory W. Dale Hall (02/28/05)
      • Re: SF: Back to theory Proginoskes (02/28/05)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory Randy Howard (02/25/05)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory jstevh_at_msn.com (02/25/05)
    • Re: SF: Back to theory ođin (02/25/05)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory C. Bond (02/25/05)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/25/05)
    • Re: SF: Back to theory Lefty (02/26/05)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory Tim Peters (02/28/05)
  • Re: SF: Back to theory Tim Peters (02/28/05)
• does point halving in combo with ECIES cause security problems? george doubleu (02/25/05)
  • Re: does point halving in combo with ECIES cause security problems? David Wagner (02/25/05)
    • Re: does point halving in combo with ECIES cause security problems? george doubleu (02/25/05)
  • Re: does point halving in combo with ECIES cause security problems? Kristian Gjřsteen (02/25/05)
  • Re: does point halving in combo with ECIES cause security problems? Kristian Gjřsteen (02/28/05)
• Surrogate factoring is a concept jstevh_at_msn.com (02/25/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring is a concept Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium (02/25/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring is a concept flip (02/25/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring is a concept C. Bond (02/25/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring is a concept Snodorkovsky (02/25/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring is a concept vodkalaskysnot (02/25/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring is a concept fishfry (02/25/05)
• Attacking the Hill Cipher Question Brandon (02/25/05)
  • Re: Attacking the Hill Cipher Question Stewart Strait (02/27/05)
• Seeking Encryption Software Referals test (02/24/05)
  • Re: Seeking Encryption Software Referals Paul Rubin (02/24/05)
    • Re: Seeking Encryption Software Referals Lassi Hippeläinen (02/25/05)
      • Re: Seeking Encryption Software Referals John (02/25/05)
      • Re: Seeking Encryption Software Referals Lassi Hippeläinen (02/28/05)
      • Re: Seeking Encryption Software Referals Brian Maratikos (02/26/05)
      • Re: Seeking Encryption Software Referals Lassi Hippeläinen (02/28/05)
    • Re: Seeking Encryption Software Referals John (02/25/05)
    • Re: Seeking Encryption Software Referals Brian Maratikos (02/26/05)
  • Re: Seeking Encryption Software Referals xpyttl (02/25/05)
    • Re: Seeking Encryption Software Referals Brian Maratikos (02/26/05)
      • Re: Seeking Encryption Software Referals Walter Roberson (02/26/05)
      • Re: Seeking Encryption Software Referals Brian Maratikos (02/27/05)
  • Re: Seeking Encryption Software Referals futa (02/25/05)
    • Re: Seeking Encryption Software Referals Brian Maratikos (02/26/05)
• linear algebra: help needed w/ counting algorithm Navin Kumar (02/24/05)
  • Re: linear algebra: help needed w/ counting algorithm Navin Kumar (02/24/05)
  • Re: linear algebra: help needed w/ counting algorithm Navin Kumar (02/24/05)
  • Re: linear algebra: help needed w/ counting algorithm Aldar C-F. Chan (02/23/05)
    • Re: linear algebra: help needed w/ counting algorithm Navin Kumar (02/24/05)
      • Re: linear algebra: help needed w/ counting algorithm Aldar C-F. Chan (02/25/05)
      • Re: linear algebra: help needed w/ counting algorithm Navin Kumar (02/25/05)
      • Re: linear algebra: help needed w/ counting algorithm Aldar C-F. Chan (02/25/05)
      • Re: linear algebra: help needed w/ counting algorithm Navin Kumar (02/25/05)
      • Re: linear algebra: help needed w/ counting algorithm Navin Kumar (02/25/05)
      • Re: linear algebra: help needed w/ counting algorithm Aldar C-F. Chan (02/26/05)
      • Re: linear algebra: help needed w/ counting algorithm Navin Kumar (02/25/05)
    • Re: linear algebra: help needed w/ counting algorithm Navin Kumar (02/24/05)
• Virtual Account Numbers uranus25_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
  • Re: Virtual Account Numbers tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
    • Re: Virtual Account Numbers Paul Rubin (02/24/05)
      • Re: Virtual Account Numbers tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
      • Re: Virtual Account Numbers Paul Rubin (02/24/05)
      • Re: Virtual Account Numbers tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
      • Re: Virtual Account Numbers Paul Rubin (02/24/05)
      • Re: Virtual Account Numbers tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
      • Re: Virtual Account Numbers Paul Rubin (02/24/05)
      • Re: Virtual Account Numbers uranus25_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
      • Re: Virtual Account Numbers Paul Rubin (02/24/05)
      • Re: Virtual Account Numbers Andrew Swallow (02/24/05)
      • Re: Virtual Account Numbers David Wagner (02/26/05)
      • Re: Virtual Account Numbers Paul Rubin (02/26/05)
    • Re: Virtual Account Numbers uranus25_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
      • Re: Virtual Account Numbers tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
      • Re: Virtual Account Numbers Andrew Swallow (02/24/05)
• AES: Augmenting 128-bit to 256-bit? Jeff Stewart (02/24/05)
  • Re: AES: Augmenting 128-bit to 256-bit? tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
    • Re: AES: Augmenting 128-bit to 256-bit? Jeff Stewart (02/24/05)
      • Re: AES: Augmenting 128-bit to 256-bit? tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
      • Re: AES: Augmenting 128-bit to 256-bit? Paul Rubin (02/24/05)
  • Re: AES: Augmenting 128-bit to 256-bit? BRG (02/25/05)
• Surrogate factoring demonstrated jstevh_at_msn.com (02/24/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated jstevh_at_msn.com (02/24/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Tim Peters (02/24/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated jstevh_at_msn.com (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated jstevh_at_msn.com (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Tim Peters (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated C. Bond (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Tim Peters (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated C. Bond (02/25/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Will Twentyman (02/24/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated jstevh_at_msn.com (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated C. Bond (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated jstevh_at_msn.com (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Tim Peters (02/26/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/26/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated jstevh_at_msn.com (02/26/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Tim Peters (02/27/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Will Twentyman (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated jstevh_at_msn.com (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Tim Peters (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated jstevh_at_msn.com (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Tim Peters (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Tim Peters (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated jstevh_at_msn.com (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated ođin (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Tim Peters (02/26/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated jstevh_at_msn.com (02/24/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated jstevh_at_msn.com (02/24/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated ođin (02/24/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Bruce Stephens (02/24/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/24/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated jstevh_at_msn.com (02/26/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated jstevh_at_msn.com (02/26/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated ođin (02/26/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated C. Bond (02/26/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring demonstrated Tim Peters (02/26/05)
• Surrogate factoring explained jstevh_at_msn.com (02/24/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Gianna Stefani (02/24/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring explained jstevh_at_msn.com (02/24/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Lits O'Hate (02/24/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Paul Murray (02/24/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Navin Kumar (02/24/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Navin Kumar (02/24/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Timothy Little (02/24/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Tim Smith (02/24/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Richard Henry (02/24/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained David Kastrup (02/24/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/24/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained ođin (02/24/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/24/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained ođin (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained ođin (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Tim Peters (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained jstevh_at_msn.com (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Tim Peters (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained jstevh_at_msn.com (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Tim Peters (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Christian Bau (02/27/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/27/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring explained jstevh_at_msn.com (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained ođin (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Will Twentyman (02/25/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring explained eb1024_at_gmail.com (02/25/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Simon Johnson (02/24/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring explained ođin (02/24/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/24/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Tim Peters (02/24/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/24/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring explained ođin (02/25/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring explained eb1024_at_gmail.com (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained ođin (02/25/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained JT (02/26/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/26/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Dik T. Winter (02/26/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained ođin (02/26/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained JT (02/26/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Richard Henry (02/26/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/26/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained ođin (02/26/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring explained Tim Peters (02/26/05)
• Question about Homomorphic Hashes Nick Johnson (02/23/05)
• Passwords and offline guessing attacks?? myhotline_at_gmail.com (02/23/05)
  • Re: Passwords and offline guessing attacks?? Kevin Drapel (02/24/05)
    • Re: Passwords and offline guessing attacks?? Bill Unruh (02/24/05)
      • Re: Passwords and offline guessing attacks?? Jean-Luc Cooke (02/24/05)
      • Re: Passwords and offline guessing attacks?? tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
      • Re: Passwords and offline guessing attacks?? Jean-Luc Cooke (02/24/05)
      • Re: Passwords and offline guessing attacks?? Bill Unruh (02/25/05)
    • Re: Passwords and offline guessing attacks?? myhotline_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
      • Re: Passwords and offline guessing attacks?? tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
    • Re: Passwords and offline guessing attacks?? myhotline_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
      • Re: Passwords and offline guessing attacks?? Bill Unruh (02/25/05)
      • Re: Passwords and offline guessing attacks?? myhotline_at_gmail.com (02/25/05)
• Opinion please? Sal (02/23/05)
  • Re: Opinion please? Kevin Drapel (02/24/05)
    • Re: Opinion please? Sal (02/27/05)
• Info on Cryptography of 1650 Alex (02/23/05)
  • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 Kevin Drapel (02/23/05)
    • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 Joe Peschel (02/24/05)
      • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 Kevin Drapel (02/24/05)
      • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 Joe Peschel (02/24/05)
  • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 Kevin Drapel (02/23/05)
    • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 Joe Peschel (02/24/05)
  • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 Joe Peschel (02/24/05)
    • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 Jim Gillogly (02/24/05)
  • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 - CIPHERTEXT Kevin Drapel (02/24/05)
    • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 - CIPHERTEXT Kevin Drapel (02/24/05)
      • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 - CIPHERTEXT Cristi (02/24/05)
      • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 - CIPHERTEXT Kevin Drapel (02/24/05)
      • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 - CIPHERTEXT tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
      • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 - CIPHERTEXT Joe Peschel (02/24/05)
    • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 - CIPHERTEXT Joe Peschel (02/24/05)
      • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 - CIPHERTEXT Kevin Drapel (02/24/05)
      • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 - CIPHERTEXT Joe Peschel (02/24/05)
      • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 - CIPHERTEXT Kevin Drapel (02/24/05)
      • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 - CIPHERTEXT Alex (02/25/05)
      • Re: Info on Cryptography of 1650 - CIPHERTEXT Kevin Drapel (02/25/05)
• About James Harris karllarc (02/23/05)
  • Re: About James Harris flip (02/23/05)
    • Re: About James Harris Severian (02/23/05)
  • Re: About James Harris ođin (02/23/05)
  • Re: About James Harris Gianna Stefani (02/23/05)
    • Re: About James Harris jstevh_at_msn.com (02/23/05)
      • Re: About James Harris Gianna Stefani (02/23/05)
      • Re: About James Harris Lits O'Hate (02/24/05)
  • Re: About James Harris jstevh_at_msn.com (02/23/05)
  • Re: About James Harris none (02/23/05)
    • Re: About James Harris karllarc (02/23/05)
      • Re: About James Harris Volker Hetzer (02/24/05)
      • Re: About James Harris Joe Peschel (02/24/05)
• Semantic secure homomorphic encryption leslie_hern78_at_hotmail.com (02/23/05)
  • Re: Semantic secure homomorphic encryption David Wagner (02/23/05)
    • Re: Semantic secure homomorphic encryption Aldar C-F. Chan (02/23/05)
      • Re: Semantic secure homomorphic encryption David Wagner (02/23/05)
• Secret Sharing Felipe J. G. Ribeiro (02/23/05)
  • Re: Secret Sharing leslie_hern78_at_hotmail.com (02/23/05)
  • Re: Secret Sharing Navin Kumar (02/23/05)
  • Re: Secret Sharing Andrew Swallow (02/23/05)
  • Re: Secret Sharing Michael Amling (02/23/05)
    • Re: Secret Sharing tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/23/05)
      • Re: Secret Sharing tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/23/05)
      • Re: Secret Sharing Henrick Hellström (02/23/05)
      • Re: Secret Sharing tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/23/05)
      • Re: Secret Sharing Henrick Hellström (02/23/05)
      • Re: Secret Sharing tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/23/05)
      • Re: Secret Sharing Navin Kumar (02/23/05)
      • Re: Secret Sharing Navin Kumar (02/23/05)
      • Re: Secret Sharing Navin Kumar (02/23/05)
• Importance of Failure jstevh_at_msn.com (02/23/05)
  • Re: Importance of Failure Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium (02/23/05)
  • Re: Importance of Failure Jim Spriggs (02/23/05)
    • Re: Importance of Failure Paul Rubin (02/23/05)
  • Re: Importance of Failure mensanator_at_aol.compost (02/23/05)
  • Re: Importance of Failure symbia (02/23/05)
  • Re: Importance of Failure W. Dale Hall (02/23/05)
    • Re: Importance of Failure stephen_at_nomail.com (02/23/05)
  • Re: Importance of Failure guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (02/23/05)
  • Re: Importance of Failure tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/23/05)
    • Re: Importance of Failure Kevin Drapel (02/23/05)
      • Re: Importance of Failure tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/23/05)
  • Re: Importance of Failure Bruce Stephens (02/23/05)
    • Re: Importance of Failure tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/23/05)
      • Re: Importance of Failure Bruce Stephens (02/23/05)
  • Re: Importance of Failure Volker Hetzer (02/23/05)
    • Re: Importance of Failure Angus Rodgers (02/23/05)
      • Re: Importance of Failure ođin (02/23/05)
      • Re: Importance of Failure Volker Hetzer (02/24/05)
      • Re: Importance of Failure Volker Hetzer (02/24/05)
  • Re: Importance of Failure Will Twentyman (02/23/05)
  • Re: Importance of Failure C. Bond (02/23/05)
  • Re: Importance of Failure Angus Rodgers (02/23/05)
• Sign e-mail with server certificate jim_adams_at_hotmail.com (02/23/05)
  • Re: Sign e-mail with server certificate Vernon Schryver (02/23/05)
• SF: Complex solutions, current state of the art jstevh_at_msn.com (02/23/05)
  • Re: SF: Complex solutions, current state of the art C. Bond (02/23/05)
  • Re: SF: Complex solutions, current state of the art Min_at_mygaff0.demon.co.uk (02/23/05)
  • Re: SF: Complex solutions, current state of the art David C. Ullrich (02/23/05)
    • Re: SF: Complex solutions, current state of the art Tim Peters (02/24/05)
  • Re: Complex solutions, current state of the art KeithK (02/24/05)
    • Re: Complex solutions, current state of the art Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/24/05)
      • Re: Complex solutions, current state of the art ođin (02/24/05)
      • Re: Complex solutions, current state of the art Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/24/05)
      • Re: Complex solutions, current state of the art ođin (02/24/05)
      • Re: Complex solutions, current state of the art Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/24/05)
      • Re: Complex solutions, current state of the art ođin (02/24/05)
      • Re: Complex solutions, current state of the art KeithK (02/25/05)
      • Re: Complex solutions, current state of the art jstevh_at_msn.com (02/25/05)
      • Re: Complex solutions, current state of the art Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/25/05)
      • Re: Complex solutions, current state of the art mensanator_at_aol.compost (02/25/05)
• Private list comparision KKH (02/22/05)
  • Re: Private list comparision King (02/23/05)
    • Re: Private list comparision leslie_hern78_at_hotmail.com (02/23/05)
  • Re: Private list comparision Navin Kumar (02/23/05)
    • Re: Private list comparision Navin Kumar (02/23/05)
      • Re: Private list comparision Navin Kumar (02/23/05)
      • Re: Private list comparision Navin Kumar (02/23/05)
    • Re: Private list comparision Navin Kumar (02/23/05)
      • Re: Private list comparision Michael Amling (02/23/05)
      • Re: Private list comparision Navin Kumar (02/23/05)
      • Re: Private list comparision Navin Kumar (02/23/05)
  • Re: Private list comparision Aldar C-F. Chan (02/23/05)
  • Re: Private list comparision Nick Johnson (02/24/05)
• really basic hash question vedaal (02/22/05)
  • Re: really basic hash question Jean-Luc Cooke (02/22/05)
    • Re: really basic hash question vedaal (02/22/05)
      • Re: really basic hash question Navin Kumar (02/22/05)
      • Re: really basic hash question vedaal (02/22/05)
      • Re: really basic hash question Navin Kumar (02/22/05)
      • Re: really basic hash question vedaal (02/22/05)
      • Re: really basic hash question Navin Kumar (02/22/05)
  • Re: really basic hash question Navin Kumar (02/22/05)
• Elliptic Curves and Orders flip (02/22/05)
  • Re: Elliptic Curves and Orders Kristian Gjřsteen (02/22/05)
  • Re: Elliptic Curves and Orders Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/22/05)
  • Re: Elliptic Curves and Orders Michael Amling (02/23/05)
• Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Simon Johnson (02/22/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/22/05)
    • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Simon Johnson (02/22/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Trevor L. Jackson, III (02/22/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Jean-Luc Cooke (02/22/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Anne & Lynn Wheeler (02/22/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Simon Johnson (02/22/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/23/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Gianna Stefani (02/22/05)
    • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Navin Kumar (02/22/05)
    • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? George Orwell (02/24/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Gianna Stefani (02/24/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Jan Panteltje (02/24/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Jim Gillogly (02/24/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Paul Rubin (02/22/05)
    • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? David Wagner (02/22/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/23/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? David Wagner (02/23/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Peter Wozniak (02/24/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? David Wagner (02/24/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/25/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Peter Wozniak (02/25/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Douglas A. Gwyn (02/22/05)
    • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Gianna Stefani (02/22/05)
    • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/23/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? matt_crypto_at_yahoo.co.uk (02/22/05)
    • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Trevor L. Jackson, III (02/22/05)
    • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? David Wagner (02/22/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Simon Johnson (02/22/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? David Wagner (02/22/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? BRG (02/22/05)
  • The most popular is always the most targetted Dave Turner (02/23/05)
    • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Michael Amling (02/23/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Simon Johnson (02/24/05)
    • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? noogie (02/24/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
  • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? John A. Malley (02/26/05)
    • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? John A. Malley (02/28/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Joe Peschel (02/28/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Andrew Swallow (02/28/05)
      • Re: Is a cryptographic monoculture hurting us all? Joe Peschel (02/28/05)
• "T-Functions" tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/22/05)
  • Re: "T-Functions" Ilya O. Levin (02/24/05)
    • Re: "T-Functions" tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/24/05)
      • Re: "T-Functions" Ilya O. Levin (02/28/05)
• Crypto++ really slow why? Chris Shearer Cooper (02/22/05)
  • Re: Crypto++ really slow why? tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/22/05)
• Field Generator Algorithm timbrigham_at_hotmail.com (02/21/05)
  • Re: Field Generator Algorithm Jean-Luc Cooke (02/21/05)
    • Re: Field Generator Algorithm timbrigham_at_hotmail.com (02/22/05)
• hash function Aldar C-F. Chan (02/21/05)
  • Re: hash function David Wagner (02/21/05)
    • Re: hash function Aldar C-F. Chan (02/21/05)
      • Re: hash function David Wagner (02/22/05)
      • Re: hash function Aldar C-F. Chan (02/22/05)
      • Re: hash function David Wagner (02/22/05)
      • Re: hash function Aldar C-F. Chan (02/22/05)
      • Re: hash function David Wagner (02/22/05)
      • Re: hash function Aldar C-F. Chan (02/22/05)
      • Re: hash function Navin Kumar (02/22/05)
      • Re: hash function Navin Kumar (02/22/05)
      • Re: hash function Navin Kumar (02/22/05)
      • Re: hash function Navin Kumar (02/22/05)
      • Re: hash function Aldar Chan (02/22/05)
      • Re: hash function Navin Kumar (02/22/05)
      • Re: hash function Aldar Chan (02/22/05)
      • Re: hash function Navin Kumar (02/22/05)
      • Re: hash function leslie_hern78_at_hotmail.com (02/23/05)
      • Re: hash function Navin Kumar (02/23/05)
      • Re: hash function leslie_hern78_at_hotmail.com (02/23/05)
      • Re: hash function Navin Kumar (02/23/05)
      • Re: hash function Paul Rubin (02/23/05)
      • Re: hash function David Wagner (02/22/05)
      • Re: hash function Navin Kumar (02/22/05)
      • Re: hash function Aldar C-F. Chan (02/22/05)
      • Re: hash function leslie_hern78_at_hotmail.com (02/23/05)
      • Re: hash function David Wagner (02/23/05)
      • Re: hash function leslie_hern78_at_hotmail.com (02/23/05)
      • Re: hash function David Wagner (02/23/05)
      • Re: hash function leslie_hern78_at_hotmail.com (02/24/05)
      • Re: hash function Navin Kumar (02/22/05)
  • Re: hash function Jean-Luc Cooke (02/21/05)
• A challenge...! Jean (02/21/05)
  • Re: A challenge...! Gianna Stefani (02/21/05)
    • Re: A challenge...! Jim Gillogly (02/21/05)
      • Re: A challenge...! John A. Malley (02/21/05)
      • Re: A challenge...! Jim Gillogly (02/22/05)
      • Re: A challenge...! Gianna Stefani (02/22/05)
      • Re: A challenge...! Jim Gillogly (02/22/05)
      • Re: A challenge...! Gianna Stefani (02/22/05)
      • Re: A challenge...! Joe Peschel (02/22/05)
      • Re: A challenge...! Gianna Stefani (02/23/05)
      • Re: A challenge...! Jim Gillogly (02/23/05)
      • Re: A challenge...! Gianna Stefani (02/23/05)
  • Re: A challenge...! Joe Peschel (02/21/05)
  • Re: A challenge...! Jim Gillogly (02/21/05)
  • Re: A challenge...! John A. Malley (02/21/05)
    • Re: A challenge...! Jean (02/23/05)
      • Re: A challenge...! Joe Peschel (02/23/05)
      • Re: A challenge...! Jim Gillogly (02/23/05)
      • Re: A challenge...! alertjean_at_rediffmail.com (02/24/05)
      • Re: A challenge...! Michael Amling (02/24/05)
• new crypto product Jacob Sheehy (02/21/05)
  • Re: new crypto product Bill Unruh (02/21/05)
  • Re: new crypto product tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/21/05)
• source code (in c) from applied cryptography Jacob Sheehy (02/21/05)
  • Re: source code (in c) from applied cryptography flip (02/21/05)
  • Re: source code (in c) from applied cryptography Joe Peschel (02/21/05)
    • Re: source code (in c) from applied cryptography Jacob Sheehy (02/21/05)
      • Re: source code (in c) from applied cryptography tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/21/05)
• SF: Doesn't work? jstevh_at_msn.com (02/21/05)
  • Re: SF: Doesn't work? noogie (02/21/05)
  • Re: SF: Doesn't work? fishfry (02/21/05)
  • Re: Doesn't work? Tim Peters (02/21/05)
  • Re: Doesn't work? ođin (02/21/05)
    • Re: Doesn't work? Tim Peters (02/21/05)
  • Re: SF: Doesn't work? Gianna Stefani (02/21/05)
    • Re: SF: Doesn't work? jstevh_at_msn.com (02/22/05)
      • Re: SF: Doesn't work? guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (02/22/05)
      • Re: SF: Doesn't work? Bruce Stephens (02/22/05)
      • Re: SF: Doesn't work? jstevh_at_msn.com (02/22/05)
      • Re: SF: Doesn't work? Bruce Stephens (02/22/05)
      • Re: SF: Doesn't work? C. Bond (02/22/05)
      • Re: SF: Doesn't work? Gianna Stefani (02/22/05)
      • Re: SF: Doesn't work? mensanator_at_aol.compost (02/22/05)
      • Re: SF: Doesn't work? Gianna Stefani (02/22/05)
      • Re: SF: Doesn't work? jstevh_at_msn.com (02/22/05)
      • Re: SF: Doesn't work? Gianna Stefani (02/23/05)
      • Re: SF: Doesn't work? David Kastrup (02/23/05)
      • Re: SF: Doesn't work? C. Bond (02/23/05)
      • Re: SF: Doesn't work? noogie (02/22/05)
      • Re: SF: Doesn't work? jstevh_at_msn.com (02/23/05)
      • Re: SF: Doesn't work? noogie (02/23/05)
      • Re: SF: Doesn't work? C. Bond (02/23/05)
  • Re: SF: Doesn't work? Nora Baron (02/21/05)
  • Re: SF: Doesn't work? Randy Howard (02/22/05)
• New RUIX cipher toorandom_at_gmail.com (02/20/05)
  • Re: New RUIX cipher David Wagner (02/21/05)
  • Re: New RUIX cipher Matthew Fisher (02/21/05)
  • Re: New RUIX cipher Eduardo Ruiz (02/22/05)
• ECM Mark III on Web Site, Now Back John Savard (02/20/05)
• Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm jstevh_at_msn.com (02/20/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/20/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm jstevh_at_msn.com (02/22/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm Tim Peters (02/22/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm jstevh_at_msn.com (02/22/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm jstevh_at_msn.com (02/22/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/22/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm Tim Peters (02/22/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm jstevh_at_msn.com (02/22/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm Tim Peters (02/23/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm jstevh_at_msn.com (02/23/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm Tim Peters (02/23/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm Tim Peters (02/23/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm jstevh_at_msn.com (02/23/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm ođin (02/23/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm Tim Peters (02/23/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm Tim Peters (02/20/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (02/20/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (02/20/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm Gib Bogle (02/21/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, basic algorithm Wayne Brown (02/24/05)
• Real algorithm, surrogate factoring jstevh_at_msn.com (02/20/05)
  • Re: Real algorithm, surrogate factoring Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/20/05)
  • Re: Real algorithm, surrogate factoring Gianna Stefani (02/20/05)
    • Re: Real algorithm, surrogate factoring jstevh_at_msn.com (02/22/05)
• Frequency analysis vs. jstevh@msn.com Dave Turner (02/20/05)
  • Re: Frequency analysis vs. jstevh@msn.com Kevin Drapel (02/21/05)
  • Re: Frequency analysis vs. jstevh@msn.com Jean-Luc Cooke (02/21/05)
• Free Webhosting from me Jason (02/20/05)
• Other "surrogate factoring" jstevh_at_msn.com (02/19/05)
  • Re: Other "surrogate factoring" jstevh_at_msn.com (02/19/05)
    • Re: Other "surrogate factoring" David Kastrup (02/19/05)
    • Re: Other "surrogate factoring" ođin (02/19/05)
    • Re: Other "surrogate factoring" Schweinkolben (02/19/05)
  • Re: Other "surrogate factoring" guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (02/19/05)
  • Re: Other "surrogate factoring" guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (02/19/05)
  • Re: Other "surrogate factoring" ođin (02/19/05)
  • Re: Other "surrogate factoring" fishfry (02/19/05)
• Surrogate family jstevh_at_msn.com (02/19/05)
  • Re: Surrogate family jstevh_at_msn.com (02/19/05)
    • Re: Surrogate family Schweinkolben (02/19/05)
  • Re: Surrogate family guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (02/19/05)
    • Re: Surrogate family Paul Murray (02/19/05)
      • Re: Surrogate family guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (02/19/05)
      • Re: Surrogate family Rick Decker (02/20/05)
      • Re: Surrogate family guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (02/20/05)
      • Re: Surrogate family David Kastrup (02/20/05)
      • Re: Surrogate family guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (02/20/05)
      • Re: Surrogate family David Eather (02/20/05)
      • Re: Surrogate family mensanator_at_aol.compost (02/20/05)
  • Re: Surrogate family Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium (02/20/05)
  • Re: Surrogate family Douglas A. Gwyn (02/20/05)
• Re: R*volume*raduis2 c3po "Theroy of everything" Douglas A. Gwyn (02/19/05)
• Re: Cheeky request klaun bekonu (02/19/05)
• SF: Any other research out there? jstevh_at_msn.com (02/19/05)
  • Re: Any other research out there? ođin (02/19/05)
  • Re: SF: Any other research out there? David Kastrup (02/19/05)
  • Re: SF: Any other research out there? guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (02/19/05)
  • Re: SF: Any other research out there? Jon Haugsand (02/19/05)
    • Re: SF: Any other research out there? Lefty (02/19/05)
  • Re: SF: Any other research out there? Thomas Wu (02/19/05)
    • Re: SF: Any other research out there? Tim Peters (02/19/05)
      • Re: SF: Any other research out there? jstevh_at_msn.com (02/19/05)
      • Re: SF: Any other research out there? David Eather (02/19/05)
      • Re: SF: Any other research out there? jstevh_at_msn.com (02/19/05)
      • Re: SF: Any other research out there? Tim Smith (02/19/05)
      • Re: SF: Any other research out there? Tim Peters (02/19/05)
      • Re: SF: Any other research out there? jstevh_at_msn.com (02/20/05)
      • Re: SF: Any other research out there? Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/20/05)
      • Re: SF: Any other research out there? Tim Peters (02/20/05)
      • Re: SF: Any other research out there? jstevh_at_msn.com (02/22/05)
      • Re: SF: Any other research out there? ođin (02/22/05)
  • Re: SF: Any other research out there? Tim Smith (02/19/05)
  • Re: SF: Any other research out there? Felix Rawlings (02/19/05)
• Encryption tutorial anon (02/19/05)
• Jones's period proxy algorithm James H. Smith (02/18/05)
  • Re: Jones's period proxy algorithm Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/18/05)
    • Re: Jones's period proxy algorithm Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/19/05)
      • Re: Jones's period proxy algorithm James H. Smith (02/21/05)
      • Re: Jones's period proxy algorithm Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/22/05)
  • Re: Jones's period proxy algorithm Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/19/05)
• Does anyone have access to broken SHA-1 paper? LDB (02/18/05)
  • Re: Does anyone have access to broken SHA-1 paper? LDB (02/19/05)
    • Re: Does anyone have access to broken SHA-1 paper? Paul Rubin (02/19/05)
    • Re: Does anyone have access to broken SHA-1 paper? Kevin Drapel (02/19/05)
      • Re: Does anyone have access to broken SHA-1 paper? Kevin Drapel (02/19/05)
      • Re: Does anyone have access to broken SHA-1 paper? LDB (02/19/05)
      • Re: Does anyone have access to broken SHA-1 paper? Francois Grieu (02/20/05)
      • Re: Does anyone have access to broken SHA-1 paper? Francois Grieu (02/20/05)
      • Re: Does anyone have access to broken SHA-1 paper? [link to note] Francois Grieu (02/21/05)
      • Re: Does anyone have access to broken SHA-1 paper? [link to note] Jean-Luc Cooke (02/21/05)
  • Re: Does anyone have access to broken SHA-1 paper? Kevin Drapel (02/21/05)
• Initialization vector usage kumarh_at_gmail.com (02/18/05)
• Non-malleability for symmetric encryption Kristian Gjřsteen (02/18/05)
  • Re: Non-malleability for symmetric encryption Nick Hopper (02/18/05)
    • Re: Non-malleability for symmetric encryption Kristian Gjřsteen (02/21/05)
• new factoring method Tim S Roberts (02/18/05)
  • Re: new factoring method ođin (02/18/05)
    • Re: new factoring method Douglas A. Gwyn (02/18/05)
      • Re: new factoring method ođin (02/18/05)
    • Re: new factoring method Tim S Roberts (02/19/05)
  • Re: new factoring method Tim Peters (02/18/05)
  • Re: new factoring method Xcott Craver (02/18/05)
• Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests jstevh_at_msn.com (02/18/05)
  • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests flip (02/18/05)
  • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests flip (02/18/05)
  • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests Larry Lard (02/18/05)
  • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests David C. Ullrich (02/18/05)
  • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests Rick Decker (02/18/05)
    • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests jstevh_at_msn.com (02/19/05)
      • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests Rick Decker (02/19/05)
      • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests jstevh_at_msn.com (02/19/05)
      • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests Matt Gutting (02/19/05)
      • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests Tim Peters (02/19/05)
      • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests jstevh_at_msn.com (02/19/05)
      • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests Tim Peters (02/19/05)
  • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests C. Bond (02/18/05)
  • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests ođin (02/18/05)
  • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests Douglas A. Gwyn (02/18/05)
  • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (02/19/05)
  • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (02/19/05)
  • Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests Tim Peters (02/19/05)
• Digital signature with Javascript devnull (02/18/05)
  • Re: Digital signature with Javascript Paul Rubin (02/18/05)
    • Re: Digital signature with Javascript Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/18/05)
      • Re: Digital signature with Javascript Paul Rubin (02/18/05)
      • Re: Digital signature with Javascript devnull (02/18/05)
      • Re: Digital signature with Javascript Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/18/05)
      • Re: Digital signature with Javascript lynn_at_garlic.com (02/19/05)
      • Re: Digital signature with Javascript lynn_at_garlic.com (02/20/05)
      • Re: Digital signature with Javascript lynn_at_garlic.com (02/20/05)
      • Re: Digital signature with Javascript Paul Rubin (02/19/05)
      • Re: Digital signature with Javascript Jean-Luc Cooke (02/21/05)
  • Re: Digital signature with Javascript lynn_at_garlic.com (02/19/05)
• jstevh@msn.com, starting threads but never replying? 8-D Dave Turner (02/18/05)
  • Re: jstevh@msn.com, starting threads but never replying? 8-D Durk van Veen (02/19/05)
  • Re: jstevh@msn.com, starting threads but never replying? 8-D Randy Howard (02/19/05)
  • Re: jstevh@msn.com, starting threads but never replying? 8-D jstevh_at_msn.com (02/19/05)
  • Re: jstevh@msn.com, starting threads but never replying? 8-D jstevh_at_msn.com (02/19/05)
    • Re: jstevh@msn.com, starting threads but never replying? 8-D Tim Smith (02/19/05)
      • Re: jstevh@msn.com, starting threads but never replying? 8-D José Carlos Santos (02/19/05)
      • Re: jstevh@msn.com, starting threads but never replying? 8-D Randy Howard (02/19/05)
      • Re: jstevh@msn.com, starting threads but never replying? 8-D Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/20/05)
      • Re: jstevh@msn.com, starting threads but never replying? 8-D Schweinkolben (02/19/05)
      • Re: jstevh@msn.com, starting threads but never replying? 8-D Rick Decker (02/20/05)
  • Re: jstevh@msn.com, starting threads but never replying? 8-D jstevh_at_msn.com (02/19/05)
• Easy test of surrogate factoring jstevh_at_msn.com (02/18/05)
  • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Paul Rubin (02/18/05)
    • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Larry Hammick (02/18/05)
    • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring jstevh_at_msn.com (02/18/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Bruce Stephens (02/18/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring David C. Ullrich (02/18/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Matt Gutting (02/18/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Matt Gutting (02/18/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/18/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Matt Gutting (02/18/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/18/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring jstevh_at_msn.com (02/19/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring ođin (02/19/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Marcel Martin (02/19/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/19/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Marcel Martin (02/19/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/19/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Richard Henry (02/18/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/18/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Richard Henry (02/19/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring ođin (02/18/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Richard Henry (02/18/05)
  • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring ođin (02/18/05)
  • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring flip (02/18/05)
    • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring mushnick (02/18/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring flip (02/18/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Patrick Hamlyn (02/18/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Gianna Stefani (02/18/05)
    • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Christian Bau (02/18/05)
  • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/18/05)
  • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Proginoskes (02/18/05)
    • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Larry Lard (02/18/05)
      • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring Proginoskes (02/18/05)
  • Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (02/19/05)
• Reality testing, sf, random or not? jstevh_at_msn.com (02/18/05)
  • Re: Reality testing, sf, random or not? ođin (02/18/05)
  • Re: Reality testing, sf, random or not? mensanator_at_aol.compost (02/18/05)
  • Re: Reality testing, sf, random or not? David Kastrup (02/18/05)
  • Re: Reality testing, sf, random or not? ink (02/18/05)
• JSH: Extraodinary to supposedly ordinary jstevh_at_msn.com (02/18/05)
  • Re: JSH: Extraodinary to supposedly ordinary David Kastrup (02/18/05)
  • Re: JSH: Extraodinary to supposedly ordinary Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/18/05)
  • Re: Extraodinary to supposedly ordinary ođin (02/18/05)
  • Re: JSH: Extraodinary to supposedly ordinary Thomas Wu (02/18/05)
  • Re: Extraodinary to supposedly ordinary Tim Peters (02/18/05)
  • Re: JSH: Extraodinary to supposedly ordinary David C. Ullrich (02/18/05)
    • Re: JSH: Extraodinary to supposedly ordinary David Kastrup (02/18/05)
  • Re: Extraodinary to supposedly ordinary Volker Hetzer (02/18/05)
• Surrogate factoring, random is better? jstevh_at_msn.com (02/18/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, random is better? ođin (02/18/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, random is better? David Kastrup (02/18/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring, random is better? jstevh_at_msn.com (02/18/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, random is better? ođin (02/18/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, random is better? Volker Hetzer (02/18/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, random is better? ođin (02/18/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, random is better? mensanator_at_aol.compost (02/18/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, random is better? Jim Spriggs (02/18/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, random is better? David Kastrup (02/18/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, random is better? guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (02/19/05)
• Does anyone recognize this? Ralph Zajac (02/18/05)
  • Re: Does anyone recognize this? Thomas Womack (02/18/05)
• Re: $10,000 CertainKey Challange Awarded tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/17/05)
  • Re: $10,000 CertainKey Challange Awarded sammy (02/18/05)
    • Re: $10,000 CertainKey Challange Awarded tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/18/05)
  • Re: $10,000 CertainKey Challange Awarded WinTerMiNator (02/18/05)
    • Re: $10,000 CertainKey Challange Awarded Gregory G Rose (02/19/05)
      • Re: $10,000 CertainKey Challange Awarded WinTerMiNator (02/19/05)
      • Re: $10,000 CertainKey Challange Awarded tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/21/05)
      • Re: $10,000 CertainKey Challange Awarded WinTerMiNator (02/21/05)
      • Re: $10,000 CertainKey Challange Awarded Jean-Luc Cooke (02/21/05)
      • Re: $10,000 CertainKey Challange Awarded tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/22/05)
      • Re: $10,000 CertainKey Challange Awarded WinTerMiNator (02/22/05)
      • Re: $10,000 CertainKey Challange Awarded tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/23/05)
• questions about k-universal hash functions jwu1_at_lakeheadu.ca (02/17/05)
  • Re: questions about k-universal hash functions Kristian Gjřsteen (02/18/05)
    • Re: questions about k-universal hash functions jwu1_at_lakeheadu.ca (02/19/05)
      • Re: questions about k-universal hash functions David Wagner (02/19/05)
      • Re: questions about k-universal hash functions jwu1_at_lakeheadu.ca (02/20/05)
      • Re: questions about k-universal hash functions David Wagner (02/20/05)
      • Re: questions about k-universal hash functions jwu1_at_lakeheadu.ca (02/20/05)
      • Re: questions about k-universal hash functions jwu1_at_lakeheadu.ca (02/20/05)
      • Re: questions about k-universal hash functions Ron Steinfeld (02/21/05)
      • Re: questions about k-universal hash functions jwu1_at_lakeheadu.ca (02/21/05)
      • Re: questions about k-universal hash functions elvis_fellow_at_yahoo.com (02/22/05)
      • Re: questions about k-universal hash functions jwu1_at_lakeheadu.ca (02/23/05)
• AGC highjacking Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard Tom Linden (02/17/05)
  • Re: AFC highjacking Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard Tom Linden (02/17/05)
  • Re: AGC highjacking Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard Bryan Olson (02/17/05)
  • Re: AGC highjacking Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard rpl (02/17/05)
• Why RC4 state table is fixed for 256 bytes Kamalesh (02/17/05)
  • Re: Why RC4 state table is fixed for 256 bytes tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/17/05)
• Re: Why RC4 state table is fixed for 256 bytes Bill Unruh (02/17/05)
• Re: Why RC4 state table is fixed for 256 bytes Claudio (02/17/05)
• can anybody explain what is CTR mode? Kamalesh (02/17/05)
  • Re: can anybody explain what is CTR mode? tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/17/05)
  • Re: can anybody explain what is CTR mode? matt_crypto_at_yahoo.co.uk (02/17/05)
    • Re: can anybody explain what is CTR mode? sammy (02/18/05)
      • Re: can anybody explain what is CTR mode? tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/18/05)
• Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes Francois Grieu (02/17/05)
  • Re: Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes David Wagner (02/17/05)
    • Re: Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes Francois Grieu (02/17/05)
      • Re: Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/17/05)
      • Re: Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes David Eather (02/17/05)
      • Re: Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/17/05)
      • Re: Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes Francois Grieu (02/17/05)
      • Re: Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes Andrew Swallow (02/17/05)
      • Re: Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes Paul Rubin (02/17/05)
      • Re: Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes Andrew Swallow (02/17/05)
      • Re: Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes Francois Grieu (02/17/05)
  • Re: Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes David Wagner (02/17/05)
  • Re: Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes Thomas Pornin (02/18/05)
    • Re: Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes Francois Grieu (02/18/05)
    • Re: Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes Thomas Pornin (02/18/05)
      • Re: Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes Paul Rubin (02/18/05)
      • Re: Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes Décio Luiz Gazzoni Filho (02/18/05)
      • Re: Minimal full-coverage test of DES S-boxes Francois Grieu (02/20/05)
• State table in RC4 Kamalesh (02/17/05)
  • Re: State table in RC4 tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/17/05)
• Regarding Salt in RC4 Kamalesh (02/17/05)
  • Re: Regarding Salt in RC4 tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (02/17/05)
• Re: One Crypto System After The Other Hits The Dust ------ One Time Pads For Sale ---- Your Solution To Security Randy Howard (02/17/05)
  • Re: One Crypto System After The Other Hits The Dust ------ One Time Pads For Sale ---- Your Solution To Security Gianna Stefani (02/19/05)
• SHA-1 Believed Broken according to Schneier John E. Hadstate (02/17/05)
  • Re: SHA-1 Believed Broken according to Schneier Grumble (02/17/05)
  • Re: SHA-1 Believed Broken according to Schneier Pubkeybreaker (02/18/05)
    • Re: SHA-1 Believed Broken according to Schneier Paul Rubin (02/18/05)
    • Re: SHA-1 Believed Broken according to Schneier Richard W. Könning (02/19/05)
    • Re: SHA-1 Believed Broken according to Schneier Mxsmanic (02/19/05)
      • Re: SHA-1 Believed Broken according to Schneier Paul Rubin (02/19/05)
      • Re: SHA-1 Believed Broken according to Schneier Volker Hetzer (02/21/05)
      • Re: SHA-1 Believed Broken according to Schneier Mxsmanic (02/22/05)
      • Re: SHA-1 Believed Broken according to Schneier Paul Rubin (02/22/05)
      • Re: SHA-1 Believed Broken according to Schneier Volker Hetzer (02/22/05)
      • Re: SHA-1 Belie