Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns
From: Douglas A. Gwyn (DAGwyn_at_null.net)
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 03:41:08 -0500
David Wagner wrote:
> But in the meantime, complaining that your way is better than ABC is not
> very helpful if you won't show us what your way is.
"My way" is to implement the kind of system
development discipline about which a great
number of books have been available for quite
some time. If you are truly unaware of any
of these, then probably the one that would
most quickly repay a modest investment of
your time is De Marco's "Structured Analysis
and Systems Specification".
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]