Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box
From: fishfry (BLOCKSPAMfishfry_at_your-mailbox.com)
Date: 01/29/05
- Next message: Jeffrey Spoon: "Re: Newbie packet verification/signing"
- Previous message: Trevor L. Jackson, III: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Surrogate factoring, out of the box"
- Next in thread: Tim Peters: "Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:21:20 -0800
In article <1107029371.197721.275380@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
>
> That's the profoundly fascinating feature of this method, as infinity
> itself is checked for results!
>
So is infinity prime or not?
- Next message: Jeffrey Spoon: "Re: Newbie packet verification/signing"
- Previous message: Trevor L. Jackson, III: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Surrogate factoring, out of the box"
- Next in thread: Tim Peters: "Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
