Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box
tomstdenis_at_gmail.com
Date: 01/29/05
- Next message: ošin: "Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box"
- Previous message: ošin: "Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box"
- In reply to: David Kastrup: "Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box"
- Next in thread: ošin: "Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 29 Jan 2005 12:41:14 -0800
What you got to like more is that is was "too efficient" when it found
that the composite was a factor of the congruence [no I won't say
surrogate...]. I guess when when rho returns n or 1 as a "divisor"
it's being "efficient" as well...
Tom
- Next message: ošin: "Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box"
- Previous message: ošin: "Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box"
- In reply to: David Kastrup: "Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box"
- Next in thread: ošin: "Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|