Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns
From: infobahn (infobahn_at_btinternet.com)
Date: 01/29/05
- Next message: infobahn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: BRG: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Maybe in reply to: newstome_at_comcast.net: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: infobahn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:22:38 +0000 (UTC)
jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:
>
> >> One programmer wrote:
> >>
> >> src[i] != 0 && i < n
> >>
> >> when he should have written:
> >>
> >> i < n && src[i] != 0
*cough*
> >
> >What part of "properly designed" did you not understand?
>
> Hon, I wouldn't call that flavor of work "design".
Nor should we expect that code posted in Usenet discussions has
undergone a full SDLC!
- Next message: infobahn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: BRG: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Maybe in reply to: newstome_at_comcast.net: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: infobahn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|