Re: Hardness of DDH with short exponents
From: Kristian Gjøsteen (kristiag+news_at_item.ntnu.no)
Date: 01/28/05
- Next message: Bob Harris: "two of three"
- Previous message: Julia Faflek: "Re: Hardness of DDH with short exponents"
- In reply to: Julia Faflek: "Re: Hardness of DDH with short exponents"
- Next in thread: Julia Faflek: "Re: Hardness of DDH with short exponents"
- Reply: Julia Faflek: "Re: Hardness of DDH with short exponents"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:28:09 +0000 (UTC)
Julia Faflek <faflek@upb.de> wrote:
>Heiko Stamer wrote:
>> Now my questions: Can we reduce the size of r (similar to [3]) without
>> essential weakening the DDH? What is know about lattice based attacks like
>> [4] in such cases? (We don't use "small" subgroups.) Are there any helpful
>> references (on these topics) that I've missed?
>
>I refer you to the paper "Koshiba & Kurosawa: Short Exponent Diffie-Hellman
>Problems" (PKC 2004, LNCS 2947, pp. 173-186) in which it is shown that
>short-exponent-DDH is as hard as DDH and discrete logarithms with short
>exponents.
This paper refers to exponents where the lower-order bits are
zero. I believe Heiko Stamer is asking about exponents where the
high-order bits are zero.
- Next message: Bob Harris: "two of three"
- Previous message: Julia Faflek: "Re: Hardness of DDH with short exponents"
- In reply to: Julia Faflek: "Re: Hardness of DDH with short exponents"
- Next in thread: Julia Faflek: "Re: Hardness of DDH with short exponents"
- Reply: Julia Faflek: "Re: Hardness of DDH with short exponents"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]