Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns
From: Tom Linden (tom_at_kednos.com)
Date: 01/27/05
- Next message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Math society, weird behavior"
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Ultimate check, new way to factor or not?"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: infobahn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:59:27 -0800
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:15:11 +0000 (UTC), David Wagner
<daw@taverner.cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> I really don't understand your point. Is this some kind of nihilism
> that denies the possibility that we might find safer ways to program,
> or the possibility that some programmers might learn something new?
> I take a more optimistic view.
There are. avoid C use another language.
-- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
- Next message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Math society, weird behavior"
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Ultimate check, new way to factor or not?"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Next in thread: infobahn: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
