Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis
jstevh_at_msn.com
Date: 01/26/05
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- In reply to: bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 25 Jan 2005 15:18:05 -0800
bryant_j_j@yahoo.com wrote:
> jstevh@msn.com wrote:
>
> >
> > There's no way all you posters are as dumb as you're pretending.
> > I think you're just trying to aggravate me.
> >
> >
> > James Harris
>
> why don't you read what Nora Baron and Dik Winter have written. They
> have given an honest account of your work. and it seems it is nowhere
> as great as you say...
What are you babbling about?
James Harris
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: [Lit.] Buffer overruns"
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Basically a sieve method, relation to quantum"
- In reply to: bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Next in thread: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Surrogate factoring approach, analysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
